117-112 to Brook? Wow.

When I heard that I thought "oh here we go, home judging yet again.

Pleasantly surprised.

Awful judging though, wasn't that wide at all.

 

Brook won but those two scores were GB making sure the Haymon fighter got beat.

 

You've survived here for 4 years being handicapped lmfao well done

Jim watt is no cheerleader his a blind silly old man who couldn't judge a fight if the cure for Alzheimer's depended on it

He will no doubt get sacked by Hearn for his performance

 

That was a bs card. Obviously a judge who likes the technical stuff, but that's taking it to the extreme. Kell by 2.

 

A tad wide.

 

Thats just not true

 

Rhodes thought he won.

Khan didn't, but you'd expect him to say that.

 

Biased as **** Sky commentators and Brook's bff had Porter up

Dave Parris had it right, 114-114 sounds right. The other two cards were ****ing ridiculous from the "maverick" judges.

Correction, Rhodes had him scraping by.

 

Not out of the question, though. 116-112 Brook was my card. There really weren't that many rounds that you had to give to Porter.

 

Brook deserved to win and he did. He earned it. Brook out skilled Porter. Porter kept hitting Brook behind the head....................

 

brook won for me by two rounds but it was more comfortable than that

 

117 seems fair