Even Brook's biased cheerleader Jim Watt had him one round down yet someone scores it 9-3 to Brook. Did someone stand to make big money on a bet like 117-112? 9-3 to Brook Wow.
When I heard that I thought "oh here we go, home judging yet again. Pleasantly surprised. Awful judging though, wasn't that wide at all.
You've survived here for 4 years being handicapped lmfao well done Jim watt is no cheerleader his a blind silly old man who couldn't judge a fight if the cure for Alzheimer's depended on it He will no doubt get sacked by Hearn for his performance
That was a bs card. Obviously a judge who likes the technical stuff, but that's taking it to the extreme. Kell by 2.
Yup. Nice chance to make some side money too Desperate to set up a Khan fight though. Hope he doesnt get shafted the same way.
Biased as **** Sky commentators and Brook's bff had Porter up Dave Parris had it right, 114-114 sounds right. The other two cards were ****ing ridiculous from the "maverick" judges. Correction, Rhodes had him scraping by.
Not out of the question, though. 116-112 Brook was my card. There really weren't that many rounds that you had to give to Porter.
Brook deserved to win and he did. He earned it. Brook out skilled Porter. Porter kept hitting Brook behind the head....................