I was thinking about this, and this is order I have, Whats others opinions 1) Froch 2) Brook (thought this before he beat Porter, just proved what I thought, he is world class) 3) Khan 4) Quigg 4) Frampton (Cant split Frampton/Quigg, I always change my mind on who wins this fight. As big a 50/50 fight as their is in UK). I never seen Froch v Groves nor would I see Brook v Khan as a real 50/50, would fancy Brook every time as I did with Froch)
There is a sense of irony around the fact that you place a fighter based on being proven, given your user name. Just sayin' :thumbsup
Seriously somebody explain to me how Murray is top 5? Never beaten one world class fighter in his entire career.
Martin Murray arguably bettered the lineal champion Sergio Martinez in Argentina. Murray also gave as good as he got against Felix Sturm in Germany. That's two world class fighters and two world champions who Murray fought away from home and Murray has a good case in both fights. Murray beat Nick Blackwell a top 5 in Britain and he also has two wins over Sergiy Khomitsky. Recently Khomitskiy was beating former WBO SMW champion Robert Steiglitz comfortably before it was controversially stopped. And in his last fight Murray beat Max Bursak who is European level. Martin Murray's proved himself at world level and only Froch and Khan have done better than him IMO.