IT'S NOT CRITICISM JUST THE FACTS!!! people go on about froch's resume people don't talk about how froch's last 3 fights before George Groves have been against 2 guy's that just came off a loss and a 42yr old glorified journeyman with 14 L out of carl froch's last 10 fights 4 have been against fighter's that won their last 6 fights carl froch is a very good fighter he fought 2 young undefeated contenders, 2 former middleweight champions and a glorified journeyman but people must realize when he fought a former world super middleweight champion he lost and the super six is so overrated 3 european's against 5 americans american tv company showtime should have named the tournament Super five World Boxing Classic five of the best yank trying to do what no american has done before conquer 168 all carl froch has done is won joe calzaghe vacant title made 2 defences loss to mikkel kessler then won kessler's vacant title by beating a middleweight that just came off a loss then beat a 42yr old journeyman with 14 L when he fought a former world super middleweight champion i.e Andre SOG Ward he lost. carl froch is the wbc paper champion mikkel kessler took his 0 and his belt remember He clearly LOST yes LOST to Dirrel and won a gift decision against George Groves in first fight, who's basically a NOBODY. Against Johnson, he started slow and produced a laboured performance doing enough to seal the win. Abraham was basically nothing more than a Joke and Glen Johnson was too Old. People go on about how great his resume is, its pretty shitty if you look at it carefully. Will he rematch SOG, will he fight GGG? If he gets Wins over these 2 only then he'll resume will be considered a good one, until then NOPE. So, there you go, Carl Froch's Overrated Resume Exposed :good
Kylie that's a very girly name, unless your a girl. You've come roaring out of the gate with your troll guns blazing haven't you. What the hell is your problem with Froch what did he do to you?
Doesn't matter to me. If Froch and Ward are fighting on the same date, different networks, I'm watching Froch. Easiest decision that I would make that weekend.
You do realize that by downplaying Froch's credentials, your devaluing Ward greatest accomplishment, Ward became No. 2 P4P because of his victory over Froch, so if Froch isn't worth ****, maybe Ward isn't as great as you think he is. Then by downplaying Froch's victories over Kessler and Abraham, that by default once again makes Ward look bad. Especially since Ward can't boast about having victories over Dirrell, Pascal, Grovesx2, Taylor and Bute. So Ward's greatest achievements are essentially jokes, removing them all from the equation, then who do you have left Dawson and Bika? I guess Ward seems to have an overrated resume as well.
You mean that single one of 100 fights he can win is the only one outside of Wards home turf, without his own referee and without those corrupt by Wards team paid scoring judges? You may be right, yeah... :deal And by the way, why you had Ward winning just 11 of 12 rounds?? Why not 14 or 15 out of twelve you ******! :hey:hey
it's funny and revealing when posters try to pin the lack of rematch on froch, ignoring ward's inactivity. he ran from bute, and wanted no part of the froch that destroyed bute.