Jake Lamotta and his overratedness(if that's even a word)

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Southpaws, Sep 2, 2014.


  1. Southpaws

    Southpaws Guest

    why do boxing experts speak so highly of jake lamotta? from a technical and stylistic stand point he's a slow, one dimension flatfooted brawler with no boxing skills but a good chin. someone explain:?
     
  2. The General

    The General Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,214
    17
    Aug 29, 2014
    What do you base these observations on? Raging bull?
     
    Melankomas likes this.
  3. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,463
    Jan 10, 2007
    Because he has very good resume, full of legandary boxers.

    He has a win over prime Robinson. Ray Robinson had 1 loss in 135 fights, to La Motta. Robinson beat many good and great fighters during that period.

    La Motta hadn't boxing skills? That's something new. His offensive arsenal was pretty good.
     
  4. Southpaws

    Southpaws Guest

    lamotta was a brawler not a boxer(don't ever say that again), he rushes in chin first taking 7 punches :!::!: just to land 1, that was his style. he couldn't box...
     
  5. pablod

    pablod Active Member Full Member

    788
    14
    Nov 14, 2011
    they must all be talking **** then, what do they know?
     
  6. Southpaws

    Southpaws Guest

    that's why i'm asking u fool..
     
  7. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,463
    Jan 10, 2007
    In boxing you don't need to be the most skillful or the fastest to be effective. It's more than that.

    Example: prime Floyd had great speed and skills advantage over slow, one-dimensional Castillo, and had very hard time with him.

    Same with Robinson and LaMotta.
     
  8. pablod

    pablod Active Member Full Member

    788
    14
    Nov 14, 2011
    you want a lesson in how to break down a fighter?
    I charge
     
  9. Southpaws

    Southpaws Guest

    floyd was injured and had to fight southpaw for half of the fight and wasn't that robby's first fight at middleweight?(need to do more research)
     
  10. The General

    The General Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,214
    17
    Aug 29, 2014
    Some people who have never boxed before seem to think that guys who come forward a lot are just head first brawlers and have no skill, which is bs

    These are fighters which have adapted to there physical attribute which usually are being short for there weight, very physical strong and have a good punch and a good chin and use this to there advantages to develop the skills to be able to beat other fighters

    Just the same way tall rangy fast fighters develop the style and skill to use these to there best advantages

    No boxer regardless of style barely ever makes it to the top without being skilled

    I think you have this image from watching the movie raging bull that lamotta just walked forward eating punches his whole career ,this isn't the case, if it was his career wouldn't have lasted 20 fights
     
    mcnugget1290uh likes this.
  11. pablod

    pablod Active Member Full Member

    788
    14
    Nov 14, 2011
    good post
    hardly anyone I know metions Chavez or duran or Tyson when asked for a list of all time great 'boxers'. but this view is skewed towards a certain (often easier to analyze) style of boxing. it takes more skill to slip inside a jab than it does to step away
     
  12. Southpaws

    Southpaws Guest

    im not too sure about that. i actually do box, im not a pro but i know what im talking about. but lamotta was a one dimensional flatfooted brawler, he wasn't a technical pressure fighter(JCC,duran) like ur describing him. if u watch his fight against robby or just any fight he's taking tons of punches just to land 1. why the hell do u think he's in the top 5 p4p chins?:!:
     
  13. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,412
    Feb 10, 2013
    If anything LaMotta is underrated. He was not slow, and to claim he was a one dimensional brawler with no skills totally misses just how good he was in his prime. Part of the problem is that most of the footage of him is from after he was past his prime. He was already fading when he won the title. So you get a skewed view of him just by looking at the films. For instanec, when he fought Robinson he was incredibly weight drained, losing something like 10+ pounds the night before the fight. Even dead at the weight it was a close fight until he started to visibly fatigue. In his prime he was considered a two fisted dynamo and one of the best bodypunchers in the sport. He was often compared, early on, to Harry Greb for his aggressive, non stop punching. He was also considered freakishly strong for his size and of course, ridiculously hard to hurt. His jab is ridiculous underrated today. Despite a relatively short reach he outjabbed Ray Robinson (among others) and was a master at infighting (he had to be with his stubby T-Rex arms).
     
    mcnugget1290uh likes this.
  14. pablod

    pablod Active Member Full Member

    788
    14
    Nov 14, 2011
    its not hard.
    either a) no expert present or past knows anything about the sport theyre involved in
    or...
     
  15. Southpaws

    Southpaws Guest

    what the hell are u talking about fool?