why do people think tyson has a better chin than frazier?

Most of us? I think you'll find it's just the OP saying that, who clearly has an anti-Tyson agenda.

 

Yes he definitely does, he puts things as a question but if you happen to disagree he very quickly gets abusive . Very strange person ,he doesn't bother me because he is on my ignore list.

 

I doubt he would kiss the canvas six times.

 

The response to the question posed in the thread should be :

Why would anyone think Frazier's chin was better than Tyson's?:think:think

 

if Tyson had learnt patience and focused a bit more on defence and less on chin, he most likely would have finished the Douglas, Holyfield fights after the final bell.

Although he was stopped, he finished those fights on his feet.

 

because he wouldn't go down 6 times, Tysons chin wasn't that ****.

 

Ken Norton, notorious for having a pretty **** chin, gets blasted by Foreman in 2 and pretty much every other puncher he fought.

Joe Frazier also gets blasted in 2 by the same Foreman but he has a great chin?

 

only a dumbass would walk head first into a tornado, don't you think?

 

It doesn't add up does it.

 

Frazier's problem was he could only fight one way, and coming forward into a monstrous puncher who is bigger, is fistic suicide .