Let's clear it up, was the Matthysse/Ortiz stoppage BS?

Very reminicent of one of those British stoppages. :deal

He clearly got up at the start of 9, and was ready to go. But the referee stopped it. atsch

Commentators: "What?!, WOW"

Exactly what I thought.

 

He had plenty of time, he got up at the nick of time. Many other competent refs would have let him go on.

He was clearly biding his time and recovering as much as possible. atsch

 

He clearly got up b4 10, don't give me that crap.

See how mad you are?

Matthysse-tards literally shooting themselves in the foot, most of them know that this was a farce.

Only a few deluded ones have the nerve to defend it. :hi::hi::hi::hi:

Keep spamming your little 10 year old insults, you're just embarrassing yourself.

You won't beat me in any sort of flame war, the poll speaks for itself. :hi:

 

This is true. He was indeed counted out at 9. Even the commentators knew it was crap. :deal

 

There's a reason they give you 10 seconds and not 1-2 seconds. You should be able to use the time given to you.

There is nothing wrong with waiting until 8-9 to get up, which he did.

 

Not exactly, I just refreshed. :yep

Anyways, I personally think Matthysse probably would have knocked him out in the upcoming rounds, but to say this was a "good stoppage" like most Matthysse-fanatics are saying is a joke. :deal

 

Nice try, you can leave now kiddo, no one agrees with you. :hi: