I agree with mike here. He is not there to discuss what happened 23 years ago. He is there to promote his play. The question was ****ed up because it made no sense. Why the **** would tyson hurt Ford's chances? Ford is a ****ing train wreck. He doesnt need tyson to hurt him.
Fair play to Mike. They no doubt wanted to provoke a reaction and got it. Bringing up things from 20+ years ago, if you look into the Tyson case in detail the whole case was a load of bollocks - he got f*cked over. If you believed you hadn't done something and still 20+ years ago people were bringing it up on national television, wouldn't it **** you off?
reporter knew exactly what he was doing he knew that it would go viral and prompt a big response from mike and i still believe mike was fitted up for that, that aggravating peanut headed reporter is definitely a piece of sh*t he got less than he deserved mike should of punched his face right in for him, he had no right whatsoever to bring that up and it was of no relevance, what a little bit*h.
Mike has really mellowed out in his old age. To be honest, this wasn't even a 3 on the "Mike Tyson goes ape **** on a reporter" scale
I like Mike but I think this just show that this whole warm cuddly thing he has going now is just an act. When things go down he is still a ghetto thug
" a ghetto thug" would have put his foot through that ass-hole interviewer's butt. Tyson acted entirely appropriate under the circumstances.
Appropriate? the man is a convicted ******/ old man beater/ child molester/ mugger & yet you skunts condemn floyd eh?
Would your reaction be same if it was Mayweather instead of Tyson and the interviewer called him a convicted woman beater?
yes, what i ****ing hate about this site is the damn double standards. mike, is a much more flawed guy than floyd ever is / was. But is heavily defended by jackasses!!
For the record, I am both a fan of Tyson and Mayweather. However, I don't believe that Tyson was guilty of raping Washington and thought it was a cheap shot for the interviewer to bring it up and he got what he deserved. I would feel the same way if he called Mayweather an admitted, convicted woman beater. People tend to defend boxers that they like. A lot of people, including myself, happen to find Tyson much more likable than Mayweather. Maybe it is because Tyson is so flawed or maybe it's because people believe that Tyson is real and didn't play any roles to make him more marketable ala "Money" Mayweather. If you play the role of a villain, it shouldn't be surprising that some people don't like you.
mike tyson, is a dangerous man from his childhood fool. you, do understand that? A ******/ child molester / mugger / old man beater too. But, he is defended loke he is some hero!! SPORTSTARS, ARE NOT ROLE MODELS FOOLS!!
"fool"? lol Are you on some sort of medication or , better question, are you off your medication? Some people would consider you a "fool" for your fandom of Mayweather but I won't go there. Tyson and Mayweather are both flawed characters but I personally find Tyson infinitely more likable than Mayweather. I wouldn't want either one of them dating a member of my family.