Dude, wtf is your problem? Everbody knows pacman was juicing...open your eyes. face the truth. NO SELF-RESPECTING CHAMPION WOULD EVER REFUSE A TEST FOR STEROIDS! He had every excuse in the book...he's scared of needles, he doesn't want to give blood cause it will make him weak. In the end it was PACMAN who refused to fight mayweather! It was ducquiao's fault the fight never happened!
Sure they do the only people who ever accused him of that were wait for it .........the Mayweather's ! He did not refuse the test the cut off was the issue .But hey keep defending the cherry picker !
If you a fighter and a world champ and ESPECIALLY if you're the idol of fans everywhere and your opponent says to you "let's both take a blood test for PEDs...the olympic style, RANDOM blood test" tell me why would you refuse. This is so fkin basic, you have to be a boxing fan to be so stupid as not to see it. I have asked half a dozen people who don't even WATCH the sport of boxing that question and instinctively they replied "he doesn't want to be tested because he's using"...basic commonsense. EVERYBODY KNOWS IT...THEY JUST DON'T SAY IT! The interesting thing was, when barry bonds refused to be tested the media dragged him through the mud and branded him a cheater...they made pacman a hero.
judging by your posts, neither can you. the diifference he's almost a billionaire with the most beautiful women in the world and a great successful career... and you're a broke dirtbag parasite who comes to a message board to hate on him
Truly pathetic ..Pacquio ducks and dodges no one even fights guys Mayweather refused to fight convenient you don't bring that up but it was he who didn't want it ..Yeah sure no one with an ounce of common sense believes the crap that comes from Floyd or his groupie fans ! And as an FYI if it were truly OSDT it would have been year round Floyd doesn't do year round drug testing so nice try at defending such garbage ! Floyd will always be remembered for refusing to fight a midget ! Manny never refused drug testing get your facts straight !
See, it's people like you...you know if pacman had asked mayweather to be tested and mayweather said no and refused to fight pacman under those terms, you and everybody else would be storming his house with torches and pitchforks threatening to lynch him from the nearest tree...especially if his excuse was that he was scared of needles...but it's aight, we understand, haters gotta hate.
First off I can't have an intelligent conversation with anyone who uses the word hater .. Second again the cut off was the issue ..But pathetic fans like you continue to defend the world greatest cherry picker ! But like I said testing was never refused the cut offs were but you keep sweeping that under the rug to make your case ..
Well, I have tolerated your use of the phrase "cherry picker" so I guess that makes us even. I could post the entire sequence of events for you that shows it was pacquiao who refused the fight by refusing the drug test. but I know it won't make a difference. You believe what you want to believe and continue to defend the greatest CHEATER of all time.
Actually what is basic is you let the boxing commissions deal with it and if you have a problem with their rules than try and persuade them to change them. No fighter, not even Floyd is bigger than the sport itself and no fighter is a substitute for the boxing commission. What if Floyd was a terrific puncher and insisted fighters wear 4 oz gloves, it pretty much amounts to the same thing thereby increasing the likelihood of a death in the ring, would that be allowed? Secondly no fighter ever fights for 17 years above his weight. After a could of those years your body gets use the new weight and that becomes your weight. Going by your comments RJJ almost always fought above his weight because he started out at 154. But no, he settled at 175 and that became his real weight at he aged. Same thing with Floyd, he probably couldn't fight at 135 no matter what.
Not to interrupt your back and forth but its hard to argue Pacquiao had no problem with testing when he was asked by Bradley twice, Mosley, Marquez twice, & Mayweather to drug test and he refused each time. Also its hard to argue he turned down request from Mosley/Bradley because they weren't big enough stars when he refused vs the biggest star.. Everybody is talking about Mayweather contradicting himself when Pacquiao is the same guy who said I fight for the fans and will take less only to say 50/50 or no fight 2 weeks later.
This really shows what people are made of... you have a guy who refuses to take a test for PEDs. EVERYONE IMMEDIATELY REALIZES THAT HE'S A PED USER AND A FRAUD. BUT NOBODY SAYS ANYTHING! They continue to act as if nothing has happened. But these are the exact same people who were just crucifying barry bonds for the same thing! It's stuff like this that makes people say "fcuk it...aint nothing but bull****!" because it makes people realize that there's really no rules. At the very least have the common decency to admit that pacman MUST be a PED user. I would at least respect that...say that you don't CARE that he uses PEDs... say you just want Pac to beat floyd, even if it's with a hammer hidden in his gloves. People can understand those feelings because we have those feelings at some point about someobody. but c'mon dude...to DENY he's a PED user? Don't you have ANY morality? Any sense of shame or decency? What kind of walking scum actually says sh8t like that and believes it...but I know you don't believe it...it's really about your hate for floyd. and to me, that just makes you pathetic.
Your first argument makes no sense. You're saying if Pacman refuses to take the olympic style test floyd should agree to a LOWER standard of testing? So what's the point of him ASKING for the test in the first place? The commission is never gonna object to MORE STRINGENT STANDARDS. The commission didn't have a problem with floyd asking for olympic style testing. The only one who had that problem was pacman...I agree with you that no fighter is bigger than the sport. And putting the safety of fighters first is a priority. This is why pacman should have agreed to the test. To lead by example and to make boxing a cleaner sport. Your second argument shows you didn't properly read my post.
Blah blah blah because unlike previous requests for additional testing, there was no rationale for singling him out in the first place. If anyone disagrees with your leaping to conclusions then they are "pathetic".