Bert Gilroy ranked with Apostoli - ahead of LaMotta - in 1942

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Dubblechin, Sep 17, 2014.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,851
    29,303
    Jun 2, 2006
    You totally contradict yourself with the excuse that fights are missing because you constantly trumpet about all the research you have done and the access you have had to files and reports that we mere mortals haven't seen.

    Now those with absolutely awful stats including one guy who being 0-1-0 and 1- 1-0 who stopped Gilroy twice inside a round:

    Have dozens [hundreds,] of wins airbrushed/erased from their records?

    Don't tell us, their other fights are all wins and they have mysteriously dissapeared from their resumes, another CONSPIRACY!

    Add another 100 fights to their resumes!!!Why aren't they there NOW!!!


    Now if these countless ,mythical, unrecorded fights existed ,given that many if not most of those had losing records ,would it not be likely that any missing fights would probably be losses?
    How would that enhance Gilroys standing?
    I was initially careful not to be too harsh with you respecting your familial loyalty, however misplaced ,but your wilful refusal to accept reality is starting to get up my nose.

    I'm not trying to discredit Bert Gilroy and havent done so because apart from yourself, no one thinks he was the world beater you claim him to have been.
    He was a good honest fighter , a very good journeyman, the bread and butter of the game ,and you are right to be proud of him being a part of your family.
    But he wasn't world class ,and the few times he ventured into it he was put firmly in his place with stoppage losses on each occasion.
    The only person being discredited here is yourself and you are accomplishing that without any assistance from me or anyone else!

    If you have a desire to be publicly humiliated then you've come to the right place!
    If you can take the stick, I can dish it out !

    Sincerely mate, take a step back, have a think and see where you are with this because there is only ridicule waiting for you at the end of this road,and by insisting on walking it you will inadvertedly cause the real standing of your grandpappy to be retrospectively devalued to a level he does not deserve.
     
  2. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
    BoxRec data is INCOMPLETE for most of the data base... they tell you that themselves.

    most fighters back then had long and full careers, especially in Britain, most fighters fought well over a 100 fights and more.

    but in typical mcvey fashion it doesn't suit to acknowledge that.
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,851
    29,303
    Jun 2, 2006

    "The torch I carry is handsome,it's worth its heartache in ransome".:good
     
  4. Warwick Hunt

    Warwick Hunt Active Member Full Member

    912
    17
    Aug 27, 2014
    I've been reading this thread for a while now with some interest.
    I've quite admired the way you've stood your ground and fought your grandfathers corner on here, even though you've generally been schooled.
    On top of that though,with this post you've also exposed yourself as a bigot.
     
  5. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
    I have NO Politics nor Nationalistic ties, I happily LOVE and reside in ENGLAND.

    were Brits and Europeans bigots during the war because they recognised the Evils of Germany's Rulers?

    are other nations bigots for pointing a finger at an alledged War Mongering USA?

    NO, these people are not bigots or particularily patriotic either for 'recognising' wrong doing.

    so what is the difference for "a Brit" recognising the ills & evils of a British Throne?

    No politics at all, just Godly Moral concern.

    Spiritual alignment if anything at all!
     
  6. Warwick Hunt

    Warwick Hunt Active Member Full Member

    912
    17
    Aug 27, 2014
    you don't know life in Britain klomp it has a division & prejudice STILL Alive today of PRO England, WE are the Greatest and the Scots, Irish, and the COLOURED Foreign imports are Sub Par... Britain is the most racist place in Europe and ALWAYS has been.

    If that's not a bigoted and totally false line then I don't know what is. It's rather ironic the day after the evil English gave the opressed Scots an oppurtunity to break away and run themselves which they rejected.
     
  7. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
    Oh I see what you've confused... you've read "We are the greatest" as though I said that, NO, that's me expressing what the British Ruling classes state or adhere too.

    No not my views at all. :good
     
  8. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,470
    Sep 7, 2008
    Don't speak for all of us Thistle. Where I love it's very multi cultural and raciscm is fairly minimal.
     
  9. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    What does it matter? your grandchildren will have to choose between decapitation, conversion to _____, or maybe if the immigrants' descendants will employ the European mercy, they will also be able to pay the jiziya.
    Europe is committing a stage by stage suicide ever since WW2 is over.
     
  10. Berlenbach

    Berlenbach Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,191
    1,252
    Sep 27, 2011
    Who were 'they' and why would 'they' want to freeze out Gilroy?
     
  11. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,779
    18,722
    Jun 25, 2014
    I copied and posted this description of what the listing is. It's the year-end global ratings for 1941.

    http://s29.postimg.org/k2mk9htlz/Page_1_year_end.jpg

    Once again, here are the ratings for the year ending 1941.

    http://s23.postimg.org/9w8efyzrv/Page_1_Gilroy.jpg

    If you have a copy of the issue that included the ratings you posted, they describe why the fighters shifted from the year-end ratings.

    http://s21.postimg.org/wp4n6yxtj/Page_1_42_ratings.jpg

    Hope that clears it up.
     
  12. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,443
    Feb 10, 2013
    It doesnt change that Gilroy wasnt rated in the top ten and could have conceivably been rated as low as 33, along with a lot of guys who were journeymen at best. You can post the year end ratings for 1940 (Gilroy's best year) and you wont see him rated any higher there either.
     
  13. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,779
    18,722
    Jun 25, 2014
    You keep counting the number of people in groups and then put Gilroy at the end of them.

    The people who put the list together ranked the fighters they did, then grouped others they felt were the same level together because they felt there was no discernible difference between them at that moment.

    The fact is he was world rated. He's LITERALLY INCLUDED IN THE WORLD RATINGS ... quite high at that. And above plenty of name fighters.

    The fact that he was so close to the top 10 that moving one or two people out bumped a couple people around him up to the number eight spot, shows JUST HOW HIGH he was viewed.

    70 years later, you can say whatever you want.

    AT THAT TIME, they viewed him among the top middleweights in the entire world.

    I didn't create the ratings, Ring did. They were "the" ratings body at the time, and they considered him among the top middleweights in the world.

    Don't argue with me about who should and shouldn't be there, I wasn't even born yet.

    That's how they were rated at the time. He's right there. They rate 15 people ahead of him, and then they say he's equal to everyone else in his category.

    If the official ratings body at the time thought there were only 15 guys they could definitively rank ahead of him, he's among the best in the world.

    There's no point in shooting the messenger. I'm just showing you what the ratings were.

    People who said Bert Gilroy wasn't world rated are simply wrong. He was. There's the proof.
     
  14. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,779
    18,722
    Jun 25, 2014
    Boxrec is incomplete for fighters today, too.

    For example, Alexander Povetkin knocked out Bruce Seldon and Robert Daniels, those fights aren't on his record. They had weigh-ins, timekeepers, a ref, ring announcers, cornermen, the whole bit, but the fights weren't sanctioned so they don't show up.

    Maurice Harris beat Tony Thompson and Tony Thompson beat Jeremy Williams and Derrick Jefferson in that Cedric Kushner tournament, and none of those fights are on there.

    Half the U.S. Olympians have losses, but those don't show up because of some agreements that were signed when they agreed to fight other pros for money before the Olympics.

    Boxrec just cross-matches the names inputted. It's not complete by any means. Especially for fights that happened and fighters that competed 70 years ago.
     
  15. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
    1943 was his best year in the RING'S - World Ratings & Classifications...

    and he was also Classified in those same Ring Ratings for 9 of the 12 years he was World Classed and of course No.1 at home for 8 of 11 years.

    But of course I don't have them ratings either, nor any fight reports, nor anything else, the man's a ghost, he didn't even exist!