Golden Era At 175lbs On The Horizon

^^^:good:deal

 

whooooop - good to see you added the 168lbers Vysotsky.

 

It was more promising 3-4 years ago.

 

LOL. If there are Russians involved GOLDEN shouldn't be used and should be, The Tin Age, or even, The Plastic Age of boxing.
So far, all the Russians in the US have only succeeded in crushing empty tin cans, so the Tin Can era is appropriate.

Maybe in another 2-3 generations when Russians absorb so real American skills they may have a chance at the Gold.

 

Didn't you have to change accounts after a Ukranian beat GRJ?

Aren't you a Korean who pretends to be black?

 

:rofl:rofl Callin out the Alt's , I love it. Thank you, we're on a mission to find all Alt's.

 

:hi:Hi Trollerby Thomas...:hi:Bye Trollerby Thomas

 

You must be mistaking me for a soup can, so you've instinctively raised your foot to crush it.

 

Erik Skoglund is my man, and fellow swede. He defended his EU-title a couple weeks ago. Against some Italian guy, I can't quite remember his name. Anyway it was a total shut-out, one judge scoring it 120-106 to Erik without any KDs or point deductions. It was the same guy that gave Jurgen Braemer problems, who BTW is ranked number four by the Ring. I expect alot out of Erik, and he is still only 23 years old.

 

really?

I can't see it myself. Dawson, Pascal, Hopkins, Cleverly etc. Wasn't that exciting to me :?

IMO the division has really come to light in the last year, and the upcoming fight is the most exciting one in recent memory.

Then hopefully the winner will get Stevenson. Good times.

Plus the upcoming talent pull that will make a name in the next 5 years. Really heating up imo.

 

All of Hopkin's fights are exciting specifically becasue in most of them, he is the underdog and expected to lose.

How many here on ESB predicted that Hopkins would lose to Shumenov, only later saying that Shumenov was a bum?
LOL. Once again, BHOP is the underdog, and the handwriting's on the wall for Kovalev's ESB future status!

 

Who is this GGG guy anyways that is accordingly a bum, I'm curious to know:huh

 

No one? :?

At least pick a fight Hopkins was actually an underdog in. Pavlik for one.

 

Your pro-Kovalev agenda is bleeding all over your post here.

Sillakh applies with what you've said, but Agnew and Caparello were not "guys that have failed but could still do something or remain relevant," those two are guys who never deserved title shots in the first place, most people had never seen fight before, and have never fought anyone of any relevance before being a tune up stepping stone for Kovalev to blast out.

Quit acting like they ever accomplished anything significant, were discussed or known by people with any significance, or were ever regarded as being future top contenders just to make your man Kovalev seems like he has fought more than 2 or 3 real contenders ever.