The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Riddle me this Cormegay

http://www.badlefthook.com/2012/2/1...0-million-55-45-split-cotto-may-5-boxing-news

 

"There was no discussion of the back end."

Well, that directly contradicts the title of that phony article, does it not? :yep

Like I said, not one legitimate example. Now carry on with your weak insults, you glass brained filipino tranny.

 

well obviously weve acquired different levels of perception. ive felt the same way for close to a decade and both fighters just keep reinforcing my beliefs.

 

Arum has preyed on the naivety of many Pacfans and they gobble up his **** like it's chocolate.

 

http://youtu.be/3kFqyTqnbYA

I can provide you with countless other examples of him being blatantly dishonest, but I'm sure that wouldn't make any difference. You'd have to want to change your opinion for it to happen.

 

Both fighters and arum too are all to blame.

Maybe some more than others, but they all have done their part in the fight not happening.

How hard is that to understand?

 

Not hard at all unless your head is firmly implanted in either fighter's ass. :yep

 

It didn't make financial sake for either side to take the fight but the truth is along with the blood test excuse Arum and Pacquiao flat out ducked the fight. The stadium crap was hilarious, the weird thing is Mayweather gets all the blame because the guy is so easy to dislike.

 

what exactly do you think that proves? pac says he agrees to blood testing before the fight and after the fight, just not 2 weeks before the fight. he has also agreed to urinalysis at anytime. what type of peds do you believe cant be detected with blood and urine after the fight and urine leading up to the fight? tell me exactly what pac could be hiding with those testing parameters.
what i want or dont want has nothing to do with i think is the truth. im strong enough to handle being wrong or not geting what i want. i may be a fan of many boxers, but i dont swing off anyones nuts. im not an omega male.

 

"Just not on the day of the fight"

"Manny, you won't be tested on the day of the fight. Floyd's offering a 14 day cutoff."

"Ehhhhhh.... Well, I didn't know that you knew about that... Ehhhh....."

 

Pacquiao uses mayweather's name to promote his next fight. Mayweather is the top paid athlete in the world fighting who ever he wants. People buy Pacquiao's fights with the thought in the back of their head the mayweather fight may be next. He dangles mayweather's name with no real intentions of making the fight.

Mayweather gets paid no matter who's in front of him. People buy his fights to see if he's going to lose. Mayweather's 0 is a big part of his allure, and if he's getting top dollar to fight who ever that's what he's going to do.

Plain and simple they need and don't need each other. If they fight then the mystery of what happens goes away. If mayweather were to lose then I believe his top ppv days would be over. Pacquiao's numbers are already on the slide and he'd probably be done ppv wise if he lost.

Only way this fight gets made is if they stop getting paid top dollar to fight tomato cans. There is no real incentive to fight as long as these guys are bringing in the numbers and dollars.

I think at this point Pacquiao is ready as he could use the fight. Mayweather don't need Pacquiao at this point. Mayweather also gave the only real efforts to make the fight and Pacquiao shot it down twice. You heard this from his people, roach himself. Floyd has a big ego and because they didn't want when he wanted he's going to act all divaish. He feels Pacquiao isn't on his level and gets annoyed they bring him up all the time.

 

Spot on.

 

so you agree that the video proves nothing?
see, the way debates work, you state some points, i address them and make some points of my own, then you do the same. if you just want to misdirect whenever you cant counter a point, then there are many trolls on here who are more on that level.
i could just play along and post up all the bull**** floyd has lied , exagerated or misrepresented, but what for? i dont need to convince anyone, anyone with any sense can already see through the bull****, and those who cant... well, who gives a fvck about them anyway.

 

You mean aside from the fact that he lied in the video?

 

what exactly did he lie about? im being serious, maybe you know more about this than i do. show me where he lied and i will certainly re-evaluate my opinion of pac.