Timeline of the heavyweight division decline.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by swagdelfadeel, Sep 27, 2014.


  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    65,895
    53,089
    Feb 11, 2005
    Yeah, Dominance can be boring.

    Waldo has stopped 13 of his 16 opponents since taking the belt from Byrd. If you can't see the genius in this perhaps it's different sport you should follow. He doesn't have midgets like Charlie Mitchell or John Donaldson to push around. Perhaps then he could be more "explosive"...
     
  2. DarthYoda

    DarthYoda Member Full Member

    425
    4
    Jul 25, 2012
    oh haters come on, Tyson focused trained say the 86-88 version gets Douglas out of there within 3.
     
  3. zadfrak

    zadfrak Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,721
    3,401
    Feb 17, 2008

    This sums it up.

    for folks not living through those fights in the 70's, just because Ali--Frazier 3 turned out to be a great fight doesn't mean it was considered another terrific match going in. It wasn't. Nobody was picking Joe. Same thing with Holmees--Weaver.

    It was like one of my personal favorite fights, the Brewster--Liakhovich fight. Going in, everyone thought Lamon easy. Nobody picking the other guy. We sure did get a terrific fight though.

    But that doesn't mean it was a terrific match going in. I'd have rather seen the proposed Brewster Tua and Sanders fights that got cancelled. Better matches going in, but likely not the great fight we saw with Liakhovich.

    Sometimes boxing fans get treated to a terrific fight. That certainly does not mean the champ was not cherry picking and looking for a soft title defense. They just didn't get the soft guy in the ring that night. Tyson--Holyfield 1 is an example.

    The Tyson camp thought they were getting the washed up guy that looked real bad in his previous form against Czyz, of all people. So, they sign the contract. The guy that showed up was different, but going in it was considered an easy ko over a name opponent.
     
  4. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,455
    21,456
    Jul 30, 2014
    dominance is boring besides the overrated klitschkos there ain't ****.
     
  5. Chuck1052

    Chuck1052 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,986
    651
    Sep 22, 2013
    Take a look at footage of any great heavyweight who was active before 1994 and Wladimir Klitschko. I am not arguing about Klitschko's effectiveness as a fighter in this post. It is simply that Klitschko bouts are dull as dishwater and do much to kill any interest in world heavyweight title bouts in the United States.

    - Chuck Johnston
     
  6. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon.

    36,448
    39,963
    Aug 28, 2012
    If a guy like Seamus wrote that I might be hurt, but you don't know much about boxing and the classic forum isn't for you. Water off a duck's back.
     
  7. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,455
    21,456
    Jul 30, 2014
    if a guy like seamus wrote that you'd know your list is right.
     
  8. Hookandjab

    Hookandjab Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,618
    552
    Feb 19, 2014
    You must be an English teacher. :lol::patsch:D:rofl:
     
  9. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,455
    21,456
    Jul 30, 2014
    um? :huh
     
  10. VVMM

    VVMM Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,372
    344
    Nov 16, 2012
    The klitschko era destroyed the heavyweight division.
    Maybe the klitschko background didn't want competitive opponents.
    against the brothers.The klitschko's background is the strongest ever the political
    correct vitali klitschko's political carrier proves this.
    These klitschkos have/had ridicolous stamina,training etc. advantage against their crap opponents .
    We can't see new north-american/british talents after Tyson,Holyfield,Lewis era.
    After Lewis started the crap klitschko era with the Klitschkos and their chicken opponents.
    (Fat and /or unskilled and/or old opponents and/or neverbeens and hasbeens and/or so many suspect cherry-pickers. )

    These klitschkos never beat an athletic,skilled and dangerous opponent.
     
  11. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    65,895
    53,089
    Feb 11, 2005

    I have no idea what any of this means.

    I do especially like that between both K bros. neither ever beat an athletic, skilled and dangerous opponent.
     
  12. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,455
    21,456
    Jul 30, 2014
    what a surprise.:lol:
     
  13. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,056
    Oct 25, 2006
    Must say, not a fan of Wlad but I shudder to think what happens when he retires. At least he has maintained a standard over the years. Imagine the likes of Chisora or Fury as champion.
     
  14. boxeo#1

    boxeo#1 Boxer-Puncher banned

    8,993
    1
    May 11, 2007
    I'd ignore troll Wuss1985 if I were you. Dude's absolutely obsessed with Douglas/Tyson. Frankly, I think he could be Buster himself.
     
  15. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon.

    36,448
    39,963
    Aug 28, 2012
    The heavyweight division will be fine. It's been lying fallow for a decade and the new crop is coming in. Anthony Joshua, Deontay Wilder, Bryant Jennings, Tyson Fury. Plus, there is bound to be a few wild cards popping up from overseas.

    I imagine that if neither of the Klitschko's had existed, then either Ruslan Chagaev, Tony Thompson, or Alexander Povetkin would have taken up the slack. They wouldn't be so dominant and people wouldn't be afraid to fight them so we'd see a lot more rock 'em sock 'em close competitive heavyweight fights. Swag is definitely sleeping on Chagaev, who's basically white Joe Frazier fighting in an era of 6'3"-6'8" monsters. Except instead of losing to Ali and Foreman, Chagaev's only losses came from Klitschko and Povetkin.