The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

What? You want me to 'prove' that you care about this subject?

Your question makes no sense. Please clarify.

 

My issue is why he even needed to lie about the 31 minute sparring.

If it actually happened, then what business is it of anyone else?

2 grown men voluntarily decided to get in a ring and keep going until someone stopped.

Why is that an issue?

 

Because "he walked trough his opponent's shots" "he on a side muff or sumthing"

 

Amazing.

But

"This time i promise to the fans i'll knock Maidana out"

 

Khan is longer?

He is not faster, he throws a fast flurry of inaccurate punches against punchbags, that aint working against Mayweather.

Old Floyd is better than young Khan.

Khan does the same thing over and over again.

Floyd figures him out and takes him apart

 

you said pac has no boxing ability

 

And Manny's last KO would be who? JMM? Woops.

 

duckweathers last legit ko was 15 years ago

 

Same here.

Ever since people have brought up this matchup I have said Khan has a minimal chance and laughed when people talk about Khan having such impressive "skills".

Khan in light years behind skills and ring IQ, and the prime example of people overrating fighters because of speed.

He has a gazillion technical flaws, among them a leaky defense. Danny Garcia is someone who always looks for openings to land that left hook.

So of course when Garcia takes advantage of Khan's leaky defense, and times a left hook, people claim "oh Khan was outboxing and outclassing him so badly".

He was up by a whopping margin of 2-0 in rounds.

And not rounds in which Garcia was taking a beating, or even getting hit that consistently.

My favorite one is when people say "Khan has good footwork".

:rofl

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by bandeedo View Post
well , i genuinely dont believe any of that. the amount of time and energy you spend on framing everything in the best possible light for floyd, leads me to believe otherwise. i have never devoted so much time to something i dont care about. but, maybe im wrong, maybe you really dont have anything better to do.

"Your participation and mock outrage in this thread says otherwise."

that was your reply after highlighting in bold letters that particular sentence.

so, if i say " i have never devoted so much time to something i dont care about", and you answer "Your participation and mock outrage in this thread says otherwise", you are unequivocally saying that i do care about the things being discussed because my participation in this thread proves it. what i want you to show me, is where i stated that i dont care about the things im discussing so we can see where your ability to think logically went off the deep end.
i know exactly where you fell off, i just want to see if you can figure it out, and how you respond either way. it really isnt that hard to follow.

 

if youve ever had to box for 3 minutes straight, much less 1/2 hour, you would know why the commission, who is paid to protect all those boxers, would want to look into it.

 

Yes, but they CHOSE to do it.

Neither of them had to get into the ring. Either one of them could have quit after 4 minutes if they wanted.

 

i love that fact that i completely OWNED you on this thread.

Now instead of rebutting what i said, twice, you've started rambling on about Pacqiauo,

taking something completely out of context.

Pac is one dimensional and pac has no boxing ability is two different things

 

so when pac boxed rios that was not a display of boxing ability?

 

actually, no they didnt. if you watch the tape, you will see where the pressure is coming from. and even if they had, it is still the commissions job to stop you from killing yourself or someone else using a sport they authorized you to practice. if you are intent on hurting yourself or someone else, it is their job to strip you of your license.