Sam Langford VS Joe Frazier, Larry Holmes and Lennox Lewis

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bummy Davis, Oct 1, 2014.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,982
    48,051
    Mar 21, 2007
    Lewis is too big for Langford. I don't tend to shout that from the rooftops, but sometimes physical advantages become too big. Reach advantage by boxrec: 10". Height advantage by Boxrec: 10". Weight advantage by Boxrec: 50-60lbs best-for-best.

    I don't really care about styles. In the world class, those kind of size advantages don't get overcome.
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,575
    27,221
    Feb 15, 2006
    But if Langford can get him to bite on one of his little traps, he is going to sleep.

    I would say that Langford did overcome this sort of physical disparity at world level, depending on your definition of world class.
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,982
    48,051
    Mar 21, 2007
    Even if Lewis was the type of guy to fall for the trap, which he isn't, i think it's so difficult physically to spring it that the chances just don't favour it.

    You lose torque punching up 10 inches, even if you can close the 10 inches. I just can't see it.
     
  4. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Ah, yes, the lost art of trapping and feinting.

    versus

    it's modern *******isation: crapping and fainting.
     
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,575
    27,221
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,982
    48,051
    Mar 21, 2007
    He might have been, but he was also seriously cautious in that type of environment. He could be reckless of course, but when he was being stalked, no.

    Tate, on film, looks fourth class and he still beat Langford. Size matters. I accept that Tate is probably better than he looks on film, but still.
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,575
    27,221
    Feb 15, 2006
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
  8. punk

    punk Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,112
    7
    May 23, 2009
    We all know how good frazier, Lewis and Holmes were. It is not fair to put Langford in with them. Too many advantages to the modern fighter. I rank Langford above them all in an all time list, the guy was a beast!
     
  9. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    I literally disagree with all of your points save the Frazier one, that Holmes is not mobile, that Langford is the most dangerous match up for Lewis. They both had extreme height advantages and brilliant jabs, and superb ring generalship. I do not think it is reasonable to assume that Langford, who struggled with the better heavyweight jabbers of his era, would somehow close the gap and ice them with a single punch (Holmes especially). Langford is a better fighter; he is not a better heavyweight.

    In a reply to McGrain you emphasize how Lewis would handle having to be hit by Langford while ignoring the inverse. Lewis would be the greatest puncher, in absolute terms that Langford fought. The inverse is not necessarily true.
     
  10. punk

    punk Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,112
    7
    May 23, 2009
    I would not disagree with this. Langord would go into any fight believing he could win. This would make every fight very interesting. Langford would come to win. I think sam could win 1 of these fights that's how good he was. This is without modern training and size. Langford is top 5 of all time!
     
  11. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,429
    9,409
    Jul 15, 2008
    Langford was outboxed by Fred Fulton and Wills .. he had challenges w McVey when McVey used his jab well .. it was a huge stylistic nightmare for him .. I don't see him doing better against two of the best ever in Holmes and Lewis .. However Frazier, who was not a fast starter and who did not love to fight small guys could get caught .. Sam was a murderous punching sharp shooter and that is a very interesting match up ..
     
  12. punk

    punk Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,112
    7
    May 23, 2009
    Does langford have 0 chance?
     
  13. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,575
    27,221
    Feb 15, 2006
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
  14. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,429
    9,409
    Jul 15, 2008
    It's brought up because the Fulton bouts show that Sam could be outboxed at heavyweight by tall talented guys with huge reach advantages .. small sluggers play into his strengths.
     
  15. punk

    punk Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,112
    7
    May 23, 2009
    I met a relative of Sam Langford a few years ago . I was posting a lot on facebook about him, and she asked about him. If you check my history i started a thread a few years ago. She shared a few stories but was shocked how famous he was. I left her in no doubt she was related to a legend!