Prime vs Prime Mike Tyson vs Wlad Klitschko Who Wins?

Wlad by mid round KO.Mike wouldn't be able to solve clutchimg,1st few rounds,Wlad get to no tough defense

 

Prime for prime Tyson takes it 10 times out of 10. Styles make fights and Tysons style matches perfectly against Wlads. Bob ' weave, slip the jab and devastation from either hand. Tyson punches through the target while Wlad puches at the target. Tyson may have fought a lot of soft touches early / mid career but he did what he should have done to them...ko 1 for most. Wlad while dominating his inferior foes took much longer on average. I can't see Wlad not getting hit hard the entire fight and when he does he goes down, but Tysons chin is the better of the 2 by far and he would be able to make a couple of mistakes and Wlads style / nature wouldn't allow him to put all the mustard needed on his shot to ko Tyson with one punch. Tyson is overrated and underrated at the same time it seems but when he was in his prime he was a dangerous man.

 

Yes lets leave Puritty out of it. Instead lets talk about Brewster who had previously lost to both Shufford and Ettiene....an Ettiene Tyson in fact destroyed. Lets talk about Sanders who never before or after beat a top 10 rated heavyweight and lost to Nate Tubbs. Come on, lets talk about that

 

wlad by shortest chicken dance in his career.

 

I'm glad someone has highlighted this awful blog. :good

It claims to provide an objective view on Heavyweight Boxing. From what I have seen, however, it takes a far from objective viewpoint. Rather, most of its content is laced with cynical bias, some of it quite disturbing but, nonetheless, delivered with an irritating ****sureness.

Being that it is essentially a Klitschko fan site, run by someone under the username of Suva Mywo (apparently from Kiribati[???]), the agenda of the blog is fairly obvious. It seemingly places all its focus on diminishing Heavyweights of the past, in favour of the Klitschkos.

A number of the posts involve the use of basic stats, combined with the blogger's own brand of definitions and thresholds. Given the basic set of numbers in play, the figures and calculations actually end up being a little convoluted, as the blogger sets up one table after another of comparisons.

I have not been all that bothered to critique the blogger's analyses. But, I'm not sure anyone actually needs to (even though the blogger welcomes any "stat-based rebuttals to [his or her] conclusions.")

It's a fine example of how numbers can be misused to draw superficially compelling conclusions, which are in fact total rubbish. However, statistics can have a strong influence on the weak-minded.

 

that blog, hwbloggers one, is truly the product of a padded cell. in a hospital packed full of seex starved gay male nurse rapists.


in darkest Botswana.

 

Wlad would be absolutely shitting himself:roflatsch

 

Based on what? One fight!

 

You have excellent detection abilities, are you a detective by profession?

 

What about them?

 

they destroyed wlad pretty fast.


odd that you forgot. not odd, I mean hilarious.

 

Wlad by UD. He'd control the whole fight but would be too ***** to open up and finish tyson.

 

Lets see....of course that fight had much to do with it. But there is also a noticeable difference in his superior skills in comparison and trainer who have talked about Busters high level of skills. If if you cant see the difference in skills you simply dont know this sport.

 

Why dont you discuss them? These were guys who were no better than journeymen who beat the guys prime Wlad lost to.