De La Hoya embarrasses Mayweather in terms of legacy

PBF lost it because he was inactive for over 12 months thus he was dropped from the ranking due to inactivity dumbass. Had he still be active he wouldn't have been dropped from his #1 ranking.

 

compared to Oscar it's lesser competition.

And Oscar was 34? If i remember at the time of Floyd fight,bu the way Chavez was 34 when he fight Oscar.good win for Floyd,but bad for Oscar.okay,whatever..

And of course because you are die hard Floyd fan,everybody ducks Floyd.only Maidana,Guerrero and Ortiz of world are true warriors who will step up.

Chavez and Whitaker are better wins than Castillo and Corrales.EASILY.

And you include Hatton and Marquez there...there is quite difference between Ricky Fatton and Felix Trininad.Marquez was career long LW,Oscar in the meantime challenged one of the greatest MW'S ever in Hopkins.yes definetly Floyd challenged him more than Oscar

And Cotto,Pacquaio beat him to pulp.again lesser competition compared to Oscar.who fought Pacqauio.(and again,i don't care who ducked who.both have their own share of ****** comments)*****s believe Floyd and *******s Pac.but that's different subject

And Oscar fought totally different Mosley than Floyd(again,i don't care who ducked who)
bottom line is,Oscar fought prime version and Floyd old version.

 

And again,Floyd has fought against some good/greats opponents.but it's ****** to say he was challenged more than Oscar..or is atleast comparable

Oscar has probably 4 top 50ATG opponents.Chavez,Whitaker,Pacquaio,Hopkins or atleast borderline,Floyd has still his precisious 0 also in this category

 

PBF is 37 and still on top Oscar was dressing in drag getting fat and in and out of rehab at 37.
Oscar fought a prime version of Mosley and lost twice a common theme when you mention his career. Good fighter good for the sport but fell short far too much to be considered an elite ATG. A top 55 or top 60 ATG is where I would rank him.

 

true but if was active he would of lost it LMAO because the time he ran to retirement was when the ww div was HOT

 

Yeah sure he would have 47-0 deal with it *******.:hi:

 

No need to go sensitive,i'm not even De La Hoya fan.i'm Floyd fan actually,or admire his skills.

I think people value undefeated records too much,they should look,who they went against.

Oscar may not be the greatest,but he tried to be the greatest.Floyd could be the greatest,but he didn't tried to be the greatest.

Nothing bad to say about both man.now i'm finished this subject,everybody have their opinions and usually those are strongs.maybe i think this agains someday and value them again,or not.never know

 

I said he had a better resume ..guess you missed that to argue your point !

Pea was closer to being prime than. Oscar was when he fought Floyd but I'll let you tell it

And the majority of the boxing public saw both those fights as robberies yet your going try educate me

 

Did anyone mention Strum ,Oscar loss and everyone knows this otherwise the Hopkin fight would had not been made ...things that make you go Hummmmm.

 

Who did oscar duck?

Anyone on the level of a pacquiao?

Truth talk.

There won't be another oscar
He was the complete package
Fearless exciting good looking boxer who brought the casuals into boxing
And he ducked no one
Mad props to the golden boy

 

another intersting question is who would beat de la hoya on floyds resume?

 

Yeah but I'm just thinking who on floyds resume would beat de la hoya I'm not sure if I can make a case for any

 

a 39 year old mosley though against a younger de lahoya i dont think so

and a marqez coming up 2 division, marquez looked too small for floyd de la hoya is even bigger

i think oscar would beat corrales too, hes definetly more skilled and corrales wouldnt have the size advantage he normally had