Tommy Morrison vs Wladimir Klitschko?

Lewis' chin certainly wasn't

 

I think Morrison wins 1 outta 5

91 Morrison was at his best, but with Wlads defense he's gonna make TM miss too much. Also Wlad has the better chin.

Wlad's jab and left hook should be his strength in this match up.

 

Morrison didn't have great head movement or lateral movement for that matter. He was quite agile for a heavyweight and very fast and explosive with his left hook but he got hit a lot by pretty much every fighter he ever fought who could extend him a few rounds. It is possible for Morrison to get an early knockout against Klitschko with his left hook but this is possible against pretty well anyone with Morrison's power. The most similar fighter to Klitschko who Morrison faced was Lewis. Lewis is the better overall fighter then Wlad if you ask me but is the easier one to hit IMO is Lewis. Klitschko is very much safety first this would make for a very difficult fight for the Duke who had a lot of trouble getting to Lewis at all.

To answer you're question about who did Klitschko ever beat better then George Foreman? No one. What fighter had similar size, speed, skill, and power combination punching then Morrison? Haye, Povetkin, and Peter are all in the same class as Morrison if you ask me not every attribute is the same, as the Duke is better in some area's then each one of these fights while they are better in some area's where the Duke lacks.

 

^Wlad beat plenty of fighters who were better than 90s foreman. That guy's resume sucks and he's fortunate to have beaten Moorer.

 

[YT]WGVeFRBgbhE[/YT]
[YT]XR4eEgWlGqo[/YT]

 

tommy isn't even a world champ of the 90sin real terms, he lucked in, hes more NABF level. but hes still better than Wlad in some ways. However I think Wlad ultimately became a better boxer, narrow skill set but well honed. Morrison never got wellhoned in any skillset, he just got a free pass to feed a whyte audience.

 

And i could just as easily put Morrison/Purrity up and Wladmir/Purrity.

 

You'd be posting a fight that Morrison looked like **** in and didn't win.

 

I think his point is that HE WOULDNT PUT that up as proof.

 

No, the point id be making is, Wlad looked ALOT worse against Purrity.

 

Wlad has proven himself damn near untouchable for the better part of a decade, hardly losing a round during the whole time and beating opponents of a higher class than Morrison. Meanwhile, Tommy lived and fought on precipice of disaster at all times.

Wlad wins 10 times out of 10.

 

Vlad would dominate Tommy if they fought 100 times and even though Vlad looked good vs Schultz it is amazing how he improved with age. Tommy was an exciting fighter because he could punch and had that shaky chin-bone but he is not the same class as Vlad, not close

 

sicne when was prime Morrison pasted out instantly by a near 38old retired neverman.

Morrison is better than wlad. the REAL wlad, not the imaginary comic book one you get off on.

I tihnk Wlad had a better (but narrow range) skillset than Morrison ultimately, and became a better boxer. A 35 year old wlad would have beaten a 35 year old Morrson for sure.

ANd lets bear no bones about it, Morrison wasn't all that, he was never elite.

 

Actually Morrison and Wlad have alot in common and no im not referring to their skin colour.

Both were bangers, big punchers with a great left hook who sometimes got a little careless and got clocked.

Both have pretty bad chins.

Both sometimes gassed.

Difference is Wladmir found Steward and Morrison found God, literally.