I posted this in another thread, but felt obliged to thread it. I couldn't believe how biased Roy Jones was toward B Hop on the HBO broadcast. HBO should be ashamed of themselves. Kovalev dominated, B Hop felt the power in the first round and turtled the rest of the fight. B Hop landed 3 or 4 solid shots, and the HBO crew went crazy for them. Fact of the matter is, he was destroyed by Kovalev, and if he would have opened up, he would have been stopped. I usually like the HBO broadcasts, but tonight they were utterly disgraceful, hoping and wishing for a B Hop win. Shameful.
Roy Jones is a disgrace. He is always rooting for the black guy and tries to convince he is winning even when he is getting bashed.
getting mixed reports from that broadcast. people complaining that roy was slobbering on hops dick and others complaining that lamply was taking a **** on hops. seems it all evens out.
Lederman had a correct scorecard. The announcers were obviously rooting for B Hop. Roy Jones went as far as saying B Hop meant to throw ONLY 15 punches a round through 9 rounds because he was trying to wear Kovalev down. WHAT????
Boxnation had the fight 11-1 with 2 10- 8 rounds I beleive. They gave Hopkins a mercy round in the 7th but even they questioned that so either 11-1, or 12-0 was what they were debating. What was Leddermans card?
Roy may have inadvertently thrown out a strong dose of hyperbole, but I thought most of his points (the ones I actually recall hearing) were point on. Roy often uses the same bag commentating tricks when announcing Hopkins fights. He said almost the exact same type of thing, as I recall, during the first Taylor fight, where Hopkins doesn't try to win the early rounds. Not saying I literally agree with what Roy was saying. But his point, I think, was that Hopkins wanted to hang in there and bide his time, hoping that Kovalev would either tire drastically or that he himself might land something big and unexpected that hurt Kovalev. What else was Hopkins strategy going to be at that point? It always had to be a back-up plan if not a primary plan, and once Hopkins (and everyone watching) got the sense early on that Kovalev was good at neutralizing Hopkins' best asset (his ability to control distance/range), Hopkins didn't have many options. But he didn't quit, he was trying to land something to change the fight every now and again, and he didn't resort to the type of tactics that so many people expected he would employ when the going got rough. I thought Jones called it fair, and at no point watching was I ever under the impression that ANYONE on the HBO commentary time thought Hopkins was winning, or even stealing a single round. So I haven't a clue what you're on about.
No, Jones and Lampley were generally fair. However, Kellerman was gushing with love for Hopkins every time he threw a punch.
Lederman had it 12-0 with the first rd 10-8, which was correct. The problem was with Roy Jones and Max Kellerman on the broadcast. TheY were obviously rooting for B Hop. I thought Kovalev would win, but the HBO crew was ridiculous I'm praising B Hop in a embarrassing loss.
He had it 120-107 (I think 120-106 was the score myself). And at one point he said Hopkins didn't look like he wanted to be there, and that Hopkins looked like he needed a coffee and 2 aspirins. Yeah! The pro-Hopkins bias was just awful!
Kellerman sucks out loud though, and should never be taken seriously. He IS a fanboy, and one who has no business commentating in any professional capacity. :smoke
I think only Kellerman was slightly bias, the rest were okay, I mean the standards that HBO set for biased commentary is pretty high so tonight was pretty tame.
I agree. Hopkins looked like he didn't want to fight or be there. Really what happend was Hopkins was bullied into submission. He wasnt even trying to throw punches, just moving and covering up. After he felt Kovalevs power in the 1st round, he went into a shell and just tried to survive until the 12th. He tried to fight in the 12th but he took one hell of a beating and was lucky the ref didnt step in.