Pac-Bradley I & II: What Crappy Fights!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Code Red, Nov 12, 2014.


  1. Code Red

    Code Red Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,972
    88
    Aug 20, 2013
    Marquez is old and only a threat to Pacquiao at this point. Most top fighters, even Bradley know how to fight a basic counterpuncher, especially one thats slow and over 40 years of age!!
     
  2. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    The fights were sloppy, yes, but not bad fights. I didn't enjoy either one.
     
  3. MoneyMayTBE

    MoneyMayTBE Guest

    Lmao at 'slick' :rofl
     
  4. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    You were probably one of the ones calling him "slick" before Pac fought him. Now you have returned as an alt, welcome back.
     
  5. Badbot

    Badbot You can just do things. Full Member

    47,849
    36,592
    Apr 17, 2011
    I liked them. In the first one i was amazed to see that Pacquiao truly is elite.
    Never really grasped that elite level status before. Reminds me of Maidana-Morales. Morales showed that he once truly was elite.

    The second fight was fun because Bradley went for the KO and Pacquiao was much more active.
     
  6. YearZero

    YearZero Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,494
    402
    Sep 10, 2012
    Yeah yeah whatever. Calling Marquez "basic" and "slow". Whats Maidana then? Give it a rest Maidana is irrelevant now anyway.
     
  7. Code Red

    Code Red Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,972
    88
    Aug 20, 2013
    Every fighter is irrelevant after they lose to Floyd, which makes Pac fighting them after Floyd even more irrelevant
     
  8. markq

    markq Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,453
    7
    Apr 26, 2010
    I don't get how Pac beat Bradley the first time easily, beats Rios, then fights Bradley again only to move up higher on P4P ranking. How does beating Rios and Bradley 2X make you higher P4P? They inflated Bradley's P4P ranking to justify it. The only reason Bradley was there is because he supposedly beat Pac.
     
  9. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    Again you *****s forget that Bradley beat the P4P rated #3 Marquez, who was coming off the KO over Pac.

    Bradley beat #3 Marquez, became #3 P4P. It's that simple.
     
  10. ecdrm15

    ecdrm15 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,274
    98
    Apr 30, 2008
    :deal
     
  11. markq

    markq Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,453
    7
    Apr 26, 2010
    So how is Pac higher than JMM who KTFO Pac head to head? Is it ranking by proxy now? Isn't the P4P list supposed to be who wins in a "mythical" head to head matchup? Bradley did not destroy JMM. No way was Bradley the #3 fighter in the world.
     
  12. Code Red

    Code Red Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,972
    88
    Aug 20, 2013
    A fight before Bradley was on ***** street with Ruslan and before that everyone claimed he had a gift decision on Pacquiao, yet his P4P rank was inflated when he should of had 3 losses in a row according to Pac fans. They even claimed Marquez should of beaten him, but now he is a God in the ring since they can use his name to try to make Pac look better.
     
  13. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    -Because Pac beat Bradley who beat JMM.

    -No.

    -He beat the man recognized as #3 in the world.

    Bradley has an excellent resume prior to Marquez. He cleaned out Junior Welter with wins over Devon, Prod, Holt, Peterson, Witter, Campbell, and Casamayor. He's been rated P4P since 2009.
     
  14. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,266
    15,085
    Dec 6, 2008
    Good thing Pac has had good fights. Unlike Mayweather, whose entire career is worse than watching paint dry.
     
  15. Code Red

    Code Red Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,972
    88
    Aug 20, 2013
    Really? So you just write an exaggerated lie rather than actually say something truthful or worth discussion. If Floyd's career is worse than watching paint dry then somehow I doubt he'd be the highest paid athlete in the world not to mention record PPV holder. See the facts just dont support your opinion....sorry. :?