CLASSIC FIGHT NIGHT THREAD:Wilder-Fury II

I think you are interpreting what mcvey wrote wrongly


I would love wlad to fight fury next but I honestly don't want fury to beat chisora . I think wilder vs wlad would be funny

 

Being classed as a journeymen is a reflection on your ability not your durability.
I made a post expressly showing where you were wrong ,using caps and underlining it but you still cannot see it.
I give up, you can't polish a turd
You are definitely not the full ticket.
Have you considered therapy?

 

Pathetic.

You hyped Pulev for months. You said Wlad was ducking Pulev, I told you Wlad would fight him.

You said Pulev had too many skills and would beat Wlad. I told you Wlad would destroy him.

You lost the bet.

You won't honor your bet, I will honor it for you. Everyone ignore this loser from now on. He said he would leave for good and now he's still here bitching and damning the man he spent months building up.

 

[url]http://www.boxingforum24.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=15576826[/url]

 

[url]http://www.boxingforum24.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=16231110[/url]

 

The Duck says he can and will.


[url]http://www.boxingforum24.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=15636200[/url]

 

^ didn't that guy make a bet to leave the forum?

 

Yep, with me.

He didn't leave. Probably won't. They never leave. :verysad

 

Wow I've not seen a poster exposed as such as sore losing troll before.

You spent months talking about Pulev as the biggest threat to Wlad. Now that Wlad dominated him you are making out it is an insignificant victory.

you should honour your bet and **** off.

 

I can feel Dino's pain in this thread.

It seems to be rooted mostly in his ****hole.

 

I can't fathom why he thought Pulev would win?:huh

 

Always honour your bets,that's always supposing you can find someone to bet with.:yep

 

He isn't all that as a boxer either, in fact he isn't all that period!

 

Look pretty good on the way up, especially considering he faced decent fighters from like...his 2nd pro fight onwards.

 

Show me where my assessment of the fight differs radically from that of Frank Lotierzo's which you have just posted on the other Wlad thread? An assessment that you called a "good article "'

You are a hypocrite and a liar.

[url]http://www.thesweetscience.com/news/articles-frontpage/19750-wladimir-klitschko-wouldve-been-a-title-threat-in-any-era[/url]

Lotierzo states that Pulev showed a lack of movement ,was easy to hit,showed he was crude stylistically and a sitting duck for right hands and left hooks . He went on to say

"He really was a poor man’s Klitschko, and he stood right in front of Wladimir with his head straight up and offered little or no movement. Yes, that's basically the strategy the slower-handed Kubrat Pulev 20-1 (11) attempted to beat the best heavyweight in the world, Wladimir Klitschko 63-3 (53), with this past weekend.
Pulev was every bit as crude stylistically as most perceived him to be. He was a sitting duck for Klitschko's right hands and left hooks. Pulev was dropped in the first round by a lead left-hook that Wladimir sneaked in around Kubrat's right hand. Pulev was visibly hurt, was dropped again and barely made it out of the first round. By the fifth round he was being battered and was stopped via a single lead left hook to the chin. But give Pulev credit for trying and not fighting just to survive. He was just out-gunned by a markedly better and more complete fighter.
Pulev is a very big man and attempted to manhandle and rough up Klitschko, however Wladimir answered back. In this fight we saw for one of the few times how athletic Wladimir is for such a big man. Starting in the second round, Klitschko sensed his superior advantage in hand-speed and laid back some and pot-shotted Pulev and usually beat him to the punch. It was painfully obvious early on that Klitschko did everything better in the ring than Pulev that one fighter can do over another. He had a better and more imaginative offense, he was quicker in getting off, and once he sensed Pulev had no defense for his lead left hook to the chin, he disguised it beautifully and nailed Pulev almost anytime he cut loose with it."

Now go back and read my posts.You ,Dummy Davis, and McGrain.
Here is what I said.

Pulev was horrible you couldn't miss him with a punch, his defence is non-existant his feet appeared to be in cement and his speed was poor he is a predictable plodder who lacks power


Pulevs feet appeared to be tied together, and he has zero head movement.
The fight should have been over after 2 rounds


Pulev had no power to hurt Wlad with even if he tagged him.
He couldn't out box him ,and he couldn't out punch him"

Frank Lotierzo has a good reputation.

Frank Lotierzo has been considered by some boxing insiders to be one of the sport’s best fight ****yst. His work has appeared in Fight Game, Boxing-Illustrated, and Uppercut magazine. Prior to his career as a writer, Mr. Lotierzo hosted Toe-To-Toe on ESPN Radio and trained at Joe Frazier's Gym in Philadelphia under the tutelage of the legendary George Benton. Between 1977and 1982, he had over 50 fights as an amateur and pro in the middleweight division. Frank is also a member of the International Boxing Research Organization and a former member of the Boxing Writers Association of America.
He certainly knows what he is looking at ,which is more than I can say for you three.Read a fight ? You can't read period!atsch