Dr IronFist vs Big George Foreman

Because Frazier was a relative midget.

So, weights and measures are a vast conspiracy. And prime for prime means one man's prime versus the imaginings of what another fighter might be.

The things I learn on this board.

If the

 

Foreman had 80 and vitali 79, very close, one thing is sure,, vitali did not have longer reach

 

I am glad that you ignored the rest OF the post because you did not have absolutely nothing TO answer

 

] obviously you never SAW frazier in person, his head, neck , hands and legs were huge...

 

Met him about 15 years ago. RIP.

 

Did I miss something in all the redundancy?

 

There are some fvcking wierdo's on this site for sure. Now the fools are trying to say that the 6' 3" 220lb Foreman is as big as the 6' 7" 245lb Klitchko. Yeah, the one who quit after Young fvcked him up. As for the other fat freak, he was slower than molasses and Klitchko who was plenty mobile enough, also threw hundreds of punches in a fight. He would embarrass the fool.

Get off Foreman's nuts ffs.

 

He was under 6' tall with a 73" reach, and weighed less than 210 in his prime. So yes, he was a relative midget compared to even Foreman, never mind the giant Klitchko.

 

He likely had longer arms, and thanks to his height would have a " striking distance " advantage over Foreman to the head.

HBO said Vitlai had a 29.5" reach, measured from the pit of the arm to the end of the first. It is an HBO record. Even Lennox Lewis had less, and so does Wlad.

 

I think it is you that needs to get off Klitschko's nuts Foxy.

 

I love George Foreman as he is one of my favorite heavys of all time.. But I can't see him landing flush on Vitali or certainly not often enough to win the fight. A couple of lucky shots are always a possibility, but at the end of the day Foreman didn't have the reach, speed or boxing ability to tag Klitschko. His defense and stamina in the 70's was borderline horrific when contrasted to what he'd need to pull this off. I can almost see Vitali landing at will without putting himself in harms way. Again, George Foreman is an ATG who has every right to be in the top 10 and would be a head to head nightmare for a lot of men.. But this is one match where I just can't see him having any sort of an edge...

 

He was strong for his weight, though. Handled Chuvalo, who was one of the strongest of that generation, like a piece of cloth. I'm not sure Vitaly was stronger.

My money would be on Vitaly in this one, though. I think. But George's jab might really cause him problems. Even young Foreman had a terrific jab. If he used it intelligently it would be interesting to see what he could do. If he comes out swinging I think Vitaly eventually weathers it and takes him into deep waters.

 

I never did ask about your opinion, i dont care

 

An out of shape unmotivated Lewis beat a prime Vitali by stoppage so what odds that prime Foreman would give him a thorough going over?
Foreman beat some ATG fighters in his prime and only lost or struggled against master boxers, something that Vitali is not.
The height and size advantages that keep being alluded to would do little more than give a monster puncher like Foreman a bigger target to hit. Also Vitali's best wins were against less than stellar opposition and tend to flatter his limited skill set.

 

You nailed it.