Lomo & Kovalev = REAL DEAL, GGG & Provo = FRAUDS

straight up

Kova is the best 175 period, he just beat up a game BHOp

Lomo has *****, and he fought Salido in his second fight. He is on a path to greatness and has a good win over Russell jr also

Provo got beat by Algeri and Herrera. Provo is exciting but a 1 dimensional brawler

GGG is 32 & still fighting guys like Adama, Rosado. His best win is Mathew fkn Macklin, he will get beat up by Canelo at 160 or 168s like Ward, Zurdo,Froch. TRIPLE FRAUD is his new name

 

Provo fighting a shot Castillo SMH

 

Thanks for clarifying.

 

British moron chicano wannabe who predicted GGG to lose to rosado, macklin, geale, stevens and rubio talking like he knows **** about boxing. Take a look at your predictions and maybe then you'll realize YKSAB.

 

Weird that he's Brit, most Brits are fans of Golovkin. So too are most chicanos.

 

At this point basically, I mean I'd rank Kovalev and Lomachencko over GGG, Provodinkov doesn't even come in to the conversation.

 

Funny thing is, if Provo was given his due by the American judges he'd have easily the best record of all of them, maybe even put together.

Maurico Herrera - true lineal champ at 140
Tim Bradley - #2 welterweight, current world champ (when he fought RP), Provo stepped up in weight
Mike Alvarado - #4 jww, current world champ, Provo stopped him in his backyard

 

I only picked Rubio ober GGG

 

If you have to label two as "real deals" and two as "frauds," then the real deals are Kovalev and Golovkin while the frauds are Lomachenko and certainly Provodnikov.

Provodnikov has one career victory over a top 10 ranked opponent in Alvarado. Meanwhile Lomachenko is a whopping 3-1 with one low end top 10 ranked fighter defeated in Russell Jr.

Kovalev and Golovkin are both undefeated with multiple top 10 opponents faced. Kovalev holds the best individual win of the whole bunch, easily, with his wipe out of Hopkins.

 

so you are admitting you are half right, at best?

 

Yeah, but that would be deliberately ignoring boxing politics.

The Russian beat all the Americans he supposedly lost to but the Russian is Russian fighting in the States so the only win he got was the one he won via KO and the ref was even hesitant to stop that one.

Ruslan's the most proven of the whole lot who should be 26-0 and a two-weight world champion.

 

Haha, okay...

I had Bradley by a point and none of the rounds I gave Bradley were close enough for me to really respect anyone scoring them for Provodnikov.

As for Algieri, while it seems the very slight majority agree with you, I do not. I thought Algieri lost only 2 or 3 rounds the whole fight.

The way you say it so "matter of fact-ly" just goes to show you're a fanboy.

And that is further evident in you proclaiming him more proven than Kovalev. Kovalev's win over Hopkins trumps any two victories combined among the other three fighters this thread is about and his wins over Campillo and Cleverly aren't all too far behind Provodnikov's performance on Alvarado... Prov wishes he could have names like Agnew and Caparello on his resume, as even those unranked fighters whom it would be a stretch for some to really even call fringe-contenders would legitimately bolster his resume from the comparatively thin state it is.

Just watch Provodnikov fight, too. He is 90% caveman, has stamina issues, and cannot adjust in the ring to save his life.

 

How about this one......none of them are frauds, they are all top fighters, everyone who really knows boxing would say that. I bet no current pros or amateurs would ever slate these 4 fighters. I respect all them.

 

Someone ban this clown already.... All he does is spam the same old **** over, and over again.

 

How is Lomachenko a fraud? He has beat a fringe contender, a top 10 contender, and "lost" (fight should have been a draw) to a former 126lbs chsmpCURRENT 130lbs titilist in his first four fights.

You're an idiot.