Broner hasn't beaten anyone. He's a stationary fighter who gets hit a lot. Even the c and d levels could tag him, and Maidana showed you how limited Broner really is. Crawford easily outboxes Broner. 120-109.
Broner is not that fast and doesn't throw much. Crawford easily picks him apart. But that fight will NEVER happen because Broner is an Al Heymon fighter and will never fight a Top Ranked fighter.
You sound crazy not that fast....he can't pick Bronwr apart.... you better be a pressed fighter if you gone beat AB
Crawford is an accurate boxer who moves around. Broner gets hit a lot. Better boxer wins and that is Crawford.
Gamboa and Beltran get blasted by Maidana, upset by Taylor, and taken to hell by PDL. Crawford only looks good because of his opposition. He won't look like that against Broners opposition.
Crawford has a weak chin, And he can't fight on the inside. He is just a tall skilled boxer, who is extremely disciplined, and conditioned. His size advantage at 135 makes him look invincible just like Broners size did at the weight. When he steps up to 140, he is going to have a problem, just as Broner did. For those saying that Crawford is more skilled, and faster than Adrien. You need to check your eyes. Crawford is not "Extremely" skilled. All he does is box. That's it. I have not seen him do anything else. He is like Devon Alexander. If you take his jab away, he has nothing. Simply because his entire offense is set up by that punch. So the people saying he would beat Pac are crazy. Broner has a more diverse skill set, he can box, and he can brawl. Counter Punch too. His problem is he is not disciplined, and he gets caught with dumb **** because of it. But if you actually look at his fights closely, he rarely gets hit clean. He rolls, and parry's shots, and that gives people the allusion that he is being hit. Broner can box with Crawford in the middle of the ring, because of his counter punching. He will put the high guard up, and counter Crawfords jab with body shots, and uppercuts. On the inside Crawford has no chance with Broner. I don't think i need to explain why. To me this fight is 55/45 in Broners favor. Broner has more experience, and he brings more tools to the table. If Crawford jumped up to 147, and fought Maidana Who would you choose to win? One last point. the people saying that Broner was Flat footed, and struggled with Emmanuel Taylor need to look at the size of the ring they fought in. There was no room to box, they had to fight toe to toe. Just food for thought.
How does Crawford have a weak chin? Broner gets hit way to often and is a stationary fighter who hardly throws a punch. Crawford accurate punching will be the difference. Broner has no power, so he won't be able to knock him out. Boxing skills, I'm taking Crawford. Broner hasnt looked good in a long time, Maidana ruined and serve fly exposed him. Now C, and D level fighters will unload and outwork him.
Lol. What are you talking about dude? Crawford has a weak Chin Because he wobbled often, and almost got dropped by a 126 pounder in Gamboa. I only saw Broner get wobbled when he jumped 2 weight classes, and fought the hardest puncher in the division. And he took Maidana's best shots all night, and finished the fight the fresher man. Crawford can't hurt Broner. 2. Crawford is only accurate with the jab. Broner is accurate with everything that is one of his best traits. Broner is the more accurate puncher clearly. 3. Broner has no power? Maidana, and Taylor don't think so. 4. C/D level fighters? Where is your grading chart? 5.Crawfords boxing skill? You mean jab, and run? What else can he do? If Broner takes that jab away, how will he beat Broner? Or anyone else for that matter. You seem to have a limited view of what "Boxing Skills" mean. 6. Maidana is the only fighter that outworked him. PDL is debatable. **** i could say Mayweather vs Agustus is debatable. See how that game works? 7. People say Broners resume is weak, but it ****s on Crawfords. Broner had a similar, and in my opinion much better run at the lower weights than Crawford. When Crawford fights the best at 140-147 then you will see what i am talking about. I like Crawford, but i am tired of people over rating his success just to bash other fighters. 135 is one of the weakest divisions in boxing.
Crawford only has a jab? Either you're trolling, or just plain stupid. Crawford can counter-punch just as well as Broner can. Crawford can box you or stalk you. Broner is still VERY hittable. Crawford actually moves his head. And Crawford looked better against top opposition than Broner did. Broner arguably lost to PDL and Malignaggi.
Broner has done nothing to show me that he could beat a quality opponent. Crawford looks better at 135 than Broner did. He gets hit way to often by fighters who shouldn't be able to hit him. Overrated=Broner They won't fight each other though, because Al Heymon's fighters and Top Rank's fighters don't fight each other.
You're just overrating Broner. The guy does have rare speed and reflexes but he doesn't know how to use them properly. He fights flat footed and rarely boxes from the outside. And he has shown that when he has boxed from the outside in stretches, he can be very succesful. But he doesn't. He chooses to stay in that high guard and let his opponents tee off on him. Why? Probably because that's how he has fought his whole life. It also doesn't help that he has a low work rate.
Broner against quality skilled boxers will not go well for him, he's a solid counter puncher as well, but he gets hit and doesn't throw many punches, too stationary. He beat up on guys who couldn't box and had no power to trouble him. Like you said PDL and Malignaggi who are solid fighters probably should have gotten the decision. Maidana who is not as gifted a boxer as Broner had the power to finally highlight his weaknesses.