It was close but clear... He made him look bad which is what is important. same sloppy fall short bumrush style from Porter...it worked well and was pleasing to watch Alexander have trouble against it but Brook just stayed composed and took control.
you had saudners hammering eubank too, i cant see how you can score 7 rounds for froch and under three for the other 2
Watch the Saunders-Eubank fight back BJS was slipping most of Eubank's shots they were bouncing off his shoulders, barely anything was landing clean, most of the clean shots that counted were landed by Billy Joe.
I had Brook winning but I thought the decision would be controversial which means I believed there were a few rounds you could see the other way.
I wanted Brook to win. I thought Brook won by a few rounds. It was not a schooling. Brook pulled away but I thought it was reasonably close. Who is saying it was a schooling?!
i thought a lot of billy jabs were just grazing and his other good shots that landed for me wernt as good as the ones eubank landed but i thought billy won but it was close. but i mean that you must have given froch rounds were direll landed more technical and cleaner shots but not then you didnt for the other guys maybe it was different to what i remebered havent watched it in a while.
Its a hard match to score I saw again last year, I vacillate between draw and 7-5 Froch I've never seen it as a win for Dirrell no matter what, and I'm not a kneejerk Dirrell hater.
yeap sure everyone sees it differently i suppose, id be more sympathtic to the carl frochs porters and eubanks of this world in my scoring
I can respect opinions like this and just look on this thread quite a few. Quite frankly I think it is ridiculous to say Shawn Porter only won 2 rounds as a few have on this thread.
yeap , the thing is though there was a good few swing rounds so the scores could be wide while being close if you know what im saying