Tyson Fury???

How do you figure?

The quickest way between 2 points is a straight line. Wlad throws laser straight punches (either hand) with KO power, Wilder windmills his right arm. Do the math and the result is clear.

Also, he doesn't have the footwork or balance to compete with Wlad.

 

not to mention Wlad has KO'd top 5 contenders
wilder has KO'd nothing but bums

 

A lot of yanks upset that fury is better than anyone on their side of the ocean right now. He decimates all American heavyweights.

 

Why couldn't he beat Wlad? Who has Wlad beaten. Just who has he beat!?

Beating the same low level opponent for a decade means nothing.

He was terrified of his life against Povetkin and couldn't even give David Haye a black eye.

What else did he do? Oh yeah. His fight against Sanders was over pretty much in the first round.
Sanders was known for a first round loss to the Tubbs , but amazingly Sanders was the one who put this supposed atg all over the canvas in round 1.

Theres no reason why Fury can't circle away from Wlads one dimensional attack just like Sanders did and pepper him away at range with his superior reach.

 

Sounds good. Only problem this is Fury you are talking about not Holmes. Wlad is better in every department. The only advantage as you say is reach.

 

If you think Wlad is the same fighter he was 10 years ago you're lost. Fact remains that Fury hasn't beaten anyone, has no power and no chin. Plus the fact he hasn't beaten anyone like Pulev, Povetkin, or Haye(did you see Haye's face after the fight?) Wlad hasn't lost in 10 years, and he won't against another false number one contender.

 

actually they arent...a select few on here that are trolls, dont lump all of us together like that :nono

 

well he tried to fight Haye but the bi.tch kept pulling out

 

How is he better every department whan he can't fight on the inside , box off the backfoot, throw varied combinations and switch stance when Fury can?

Fury also has a height and reach advantage.

 

I wouldn't say that strictly speaking. I'm English and I've being so Fury fan since the start of his career, as have a lot of my friends. I don't think it's a case of being fair weather fans, as you have stated several times, but the fact is boxing is not a mainstream sport and the majority of punters are clueless. I mean this is a boxing forum and 90% of the people of on here are clueless. Fury has attracted a lot of negative attention to himself with his antics, and in turn has received a lot of mindless abuse, but if you value the opinion of idiots, you can't be far off yourself.

I actually love the idea of a Heavyweight World Champion pikey from Manchester, I think its priceless when you think of the prestige of division and would be the polar opposite to Wlads boring reign.

 

Boring yet he puts people in the seats and gets huge ratings, and is going back to the U.S. to fight. Fury hasn't earned the right to try and act like Mayweather because he hasn't done anything.

 

wlad is a chinless octupus. very fragile mandible.

 

In that case... God bless america , he's got the same kind of haters in Britain to be fair.

 

I'm sorry but I don't understand where any of your comment came from in relation to my comment, or in general to be honest? Only thing I can think of is your getting go bit p issy because I said Wlads reign has being boring.

 

I'm a big Fury fan and really don't like Wlad, but to say the only advantage he has is experience is pretty deluded pal. Power, strength, jab, skill as well as hometown advantage. I would say Fury has speed, height and reach, possibly stamina, as well as being more versatile and unorthodox. He would be crazy to try going southpaw on Wlad also.