20 title (belt) defenses are certainly nothing to sneer at, but he really lost the last one. Where do you have him at the weight?
He was tied 20th in the ESB poll: 1. 1049 Sugar Ray Robinson (41) 2. 524 Sugar Ray Leonard 3. 322 Henry Armstrong 4. 301 Jose Napoles 5. 275 Kid Gavilan 6. 207 Emile Griffith 7. 174 Tommy Hearns 8. 129 Luis Rodriguez 9. 111 Barbados Joe Walcott 10. 87 Mickey Walker 11. 66 Roberto Duran 12. 53 Carmen Basillo 13. 47 Charles Burley 14. 42 Jack Britton 15. 39 Tommy Ryan (1) 16. 26 Sam Langford (1) 17. 25 Pernell Whitaker 18. 24 Don Curry 19. 21 Jimmy Mclarnin 20. 19 [tie] Felix Trinidad 20. 19 [tie] Barney Ross
Yeah, Trinidad picked up the lineal title...against Oscar De La Hoya, in a robbery. Then he vacated it. Probably that explains his low ranking in the ESB poll.
Felix Trinidad getting an unjustified kicking here. Comparing his reign to a mediocrity like Pipino Cuevas is intersting to say the least. Trinidad beat Oba Carr and Ramon Campas when both were at their absolute peaks, and held a combined record of 88-0. Campas would go on to win a world title at 154 while Carr gave De la Hoya a much tougher time about 7 years after Tito knocked him out. Pernell Whitaker had never lost anything but two highly controversial decisions before Trinidad broke his jaw and trounced him over 12. Felix was always must-watch. He had an engine as good as anybody around in his day, a legitimate KO shot in both hands but in particular his left hook, and the heart and desire of a Roberto Duran. Not his fault De la Hoya ran away from him in the home straight of their fight. Can understand him not being top 10, though i think it's arguable, but at the same level as Pipino Cuevas? No chance!
Six defences of the lineal title, which he only lost in an outright robbery surely gets him into the twenty?
If we're counting a clear 7-5 as an 'outright robbery' then we should do the same for LMR's fights with Griffith. By this criteria, Floyd Jr would be a top 20 welterweight. No thanks.
No, I don't agree with this. There's absolutely no way to score Tito-Oscar for Tito reasonably, by my eye. Whatever the details of Griffith-LMR, the facts are that that three times in four fights, ringside reporters scored for Griffith and three times in four fights, the judges scored for Griffith. Real result: 3-1 Griffith. Floyd has one successful defence.
Disagree: I think Oscar was legitimately hurt in the 6th and this is probably the meat of what went wrong here. I'm not sure how I feel about the fight overall for Oscar's legacy. It was shown, as you say, that he was made to feel gunshy which is a slight black mark, additionally a combination of a **** Quartey fight plan, good small-move De La Hoya footwork pretty much took Ike's jab away, partially. This renders him an, I don't want to say "ordinary", but limited fighter offensively. He's not great on defence. Why isn't Oscar abusing him? Still, you can't deny his courage and I for one thought he deserved it. OSCAR: 1,2,3,4,10,12 QUARTEY: 5,6,7,8,9,11 114-113 OSCAR Oscar De La Hoya UD12 Pernell Whitaker OSCAR 2,3,4,7,8,10,12 PEA: 1,5,6,9,11 7-5 Oscar De La Hoya For the first time ever one of my cards matches Lederman's exactly, I gave exactly the same rounds to each man. It is quite a difficult fight to score and that's reflected in the scorers ringside. Lederman gave it to Oscar, Merchant gave it to Whitaker or saw it a draw depending on what he did with the last round, 3 judges gave it to Oscar, 11 writers gave it to Oscar and 14 writers gave it Whitaker. I make that a dead heat if Merchant found a way to give the twelfth to Whitaker, the slimmest of edges to De La Hoya if he scored the 12th otherwise. Pea looked like he was going to take it based upon round one, Oscar just looked legitimately befuddled in mp opinion but Oscar was able to up his workrate and just take some chances. His original plan to walk through a fighter who wouldn't even be there if you got there was obviously ludicrous, but the boiled down version worked well for him in about the 17th fight where the HBO crew tells us that Oscar's best punch is his left hook but he can't throw it tonight. The ludicrous WBC rule regarding accidental headbutts set Pernell a real stall and after he lost the third and fourth on my card I had my doubts, but he put together his only two rounds in a row in the fight in 5 and 6 to make it competitive again and combined with the messy knock down (which evened things up nicely on the cards Karma-wise) he was right back in the fight. Unfortunately for him, Oscar just knows judges and he upeed his game after the 9th and again in the 12th. As we now know, he needn't have bothered his ****, but it was a good determined play. A real what-you-prefer type of fight, and personally I like to score for the guy that learned the more hurtful punches. I thought it was interesting the way Oscar abandoned his own jab, just like he would against Mayweather years later...I think he thinks he can't throw it when he's being out-boxed, he just needs the statement punches. It worked for him here, but with diminishing returns on his speed, he would get caught out next time. I do think that Whitaker looked old. Whenever I watch him in his younger days he looks unnatural in the ring he is having such a good time. He always looks to me like he's playng basketball when he's boxing, but here things had a bitter twist - he wasn't quite fast enough. A word for Oscar's corner who were pitiful. In the rounds that turned the fight around, the third and the fourth, he had great success choping Whitkaer out of clinches and giving him a push here and there. The corner shat it off the cut and read the fight all wrong when they demanded their man stay outside. I think Oscar new it too. Shame he didn't heed his own heart over the matter, he may have won this clean.
I had a DLH shading the Pea fight with a point or two, and Quartey shading his fight with DLH with about the same margin. Neither one was a robbery IMO. In the fight against Tito I think I remember Oscar winning 7 or 8 rds CLEARLY. And that's a robbery for me - when the "winner" doesn't get more rounds even when every remotely close round is scored for him. Going back to Tito's reign, about how many of those defenses were against Ring ranked opposition?
I think the DLH-Whitaker fight could easily have gone Whitaker's way. How wide a robbery was Tito-DLH ?
I don't believe it was 3 out of for 4 for ringside. Anyway, by my eye that clearly wasn't the case, just as I had the Trinidad fight a clear 115-113 win for De La Hoya. Floyd has many more than one successful defence at welterweight. I don't care that he took two years out myself, he has been the best welterweight in the world since he beat Baldomir.