Lewis would have went through Wlad's resume undefeated and completely dominant

he was retiring. that makes sense, what part of it doesn't make sense to you.

yes there is, between retiring Sanders and prime Rahman/McCall there is A VAST different.

do you not understand the difference between being prime and being retiring? if not there is no point discussing this with you further until you learn it, come back then.

..yes against a prime legit contender , true. not against a retiree like sanders, shot2**** but still heavyhanded.

wlads prime legit contenders were povetkin and haye, so I thinkone of these two might have caught him out.
Whats the problem?


you just go off and answer people who agree with you instead.

 

:good

 

Both Wlad or Lewis KO Sanders on paper because Corrie was vulnerable. But on any given night, Sanders was dangerous: fast, southpaw, powerful and low-profile enough that you might not take him seriously - that's a potential nightmare for any defending champ. If he got to either man first, he would have a chance to knock them out. A puncher's chance, nothing more, but against Wlad that came in to play and it could have against Lewis as well. And you can't tell me that the McCall Lewis' fought who already had 5 losses on his resumé by then was a more dangerous fighter than 2003 Corrie Sanders.

 

no wlad does not ko retiree level sanders on paper. he gets destroyed by him instantly, don't be unfair to corrie. as exactly what happened.

and on paper sanders even when prime doe not possess ability to get in contention for lewis, as exactly what happened.

if you want to write fanfiction on paper, go elsewhere.

 

Both Ali and Louis fougbt far more often against top comp. Lol, even Louis' so called bum of the month club he faced like 6 top 10 contenders in a year.

 

Again. Who has Wlad ducked? Boxers don't fight as much as they used to in general, so moot point. However if you're going to put Wlad under a microscope and scrutinize everything he does mine as well do the same to the old greats.

 

again shot2**** retiree corrie sanders.

 

no but wlad does for getting instantly destroyed by a retiree who shouldn't never ever have been fighting for the title even when prime.

 

Proof that he ducked him? Just because they didn't fight again doesn't mean he ducked him. By the time Wlad had won another world title Sanders was out of the mix.

 

Yet he's gone on to dominate the division for the better part of a decade. :yep

 

yet he got destroyed by a retiree instantly, a guy whocouldnt touch lewis when prime.

 

its up to a world champ to win his title back or prove the first fight was a fluke, or else it stands as valid.

wlad didn't want to know, he didn't want to get koed instantly again by a shot2**** retiree.

 

Ok so you have no proof, has there been an immediate rematch after every heavyweight world title fight??

 

Corrie said he never knew why Wlad didn't want to fight him.

Wlad went and fought nobody Moli while Sanders went and fought Vitali , who at the time was seen as the bigger , better and harder hitting brother.

But in K World Sanders was afraid of the guy he had annihilated easily in two rounds?? Give me a break please.

Wlad had the rematch clause and never exercised it.

He had no problem rematching Evert Martin who had 40 loses.

 

who says I have no proof, you? you obviously are trying to avoid the issue. its documented that corrie doesn't kknow why wald never sought a rematch with him to right his loss.

also, who says it has to be immediate?wlad didn't do it at all! that's the issue here, nothing about 'immediate'.