The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. woombox

    woombox Active Member banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Messages:
    681
    Likes Received:
    13
    I've thought for years Mayweather was ducking Pac however this post proves me wrong.
     
  2. kamkam6

    kamkam6 Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2010
    Messages:
    210
    Likes Received:
    0
    Fighter X said no problem with drugs test and knocked out fighter Y in the sixth round. Lmao
     
  3. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2013
    Messages:
    239,408
    Likes Received:
    231,101
    Fighter Y sounds like he wants to have gay *** with Fighter X:yep
     
  4. Chango

    Chango Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    1,594
    Likes Received:
    5
    Fighter X should stop listening to his Promoter B and take the test. If Fighter X has nothing to hide, then take the damn test.
     
  5. boyschoir

    boyschoir Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2011
    Messages:
    3,662
    Likes Received:
    0
    i thought fighter x has been devouring leftovers at catchweights?

    why test? :hey

    did i mention that fighter x has several losses and been KO'd several times :good
     
  6. boyschoir

    boyschoir Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2011
    Messages:
    3,662
    Likes Received:
    0
    :rofl

    PED's wasn't invented in when Floyd fought a bigger ODLH and an undefeated Hatton

    suddenly Pac with 3 losses on his record came in and PED's was invented in Floyd's dictionary :rofl

    i say that's still a quack quack :hi:
     
  7. HoldMyBeer

    HoldMyBeer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2010
    Messages:
    12,346
    Likes Received:
    6
    then they'll both be forced to take the test
     
  8. Tekniqs

    Tekniqs Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    4,911
    Likes Received:
    4
    you, sir, are quite brilliant. What you have done is evidence of your incomprehensible intelligence. No great minds of the past could have mustered up the brain power to add "NoI" in between the 'K' and 'Q' in Markq's forum name. You are simply a scholar and a gentleman. I hope you realize one day that great minds like yours don't belong in this forum. You should be out there curing cancer....


    :patsch

    jesus christ, that's what passes off as "clever" nowadays? You added "NoI" and it's supposed to be "rofl" worthy?
     
  9. Tekniqs

    Tekniqs Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    4,911
    Likes Received:
    4
    the hell are you guys going on about?

    'neutral place'? y'all act like Vegas hasn't held the biggest fights in recent memory. Just because Floyd is from Vegas doesn't mean the JUDGES there aren't impartial.

    an honest ref...who do you have in mind?
    3 honest judges? do you think judges would gift the fight to Floyd?

    60-40 split to Floyd IMO. There's a rematch clause in there. Have Pacquiao beat FLoyd then he can call the shots in the negotiations for the 2nd fight.
     
  10. HoldMyBeer

    HoldMyBeer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2010
    Messages:
    12,346
    Likes Received:
    6
    you'd need specifics for the rematch
    60-40 to pac if he wins the first fight should do it
     
  11. Tekniqs

    Tekniqs Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    4,911
    Likes Received:
    4
    Pac would be the A-side come rematch time if he wins the first fight. He can demand whatever the hell he wants. If Floyd doesn't agree, Pac can just retire and not give him the fight. He'll always have bragging rights in that scenario.
     
  12. HoldMyBeer

    HoldMyBeer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2010
    Messages:
    12,346
    Likes Received:
    6
    true, but saying "pac gets to call the shots" is too ambiguous
    can only hurt the chance of a rematch

    if Floyd gets 60-40 split in #1 and a victorious pac gets the same in a rematch - sounds reasonable enough
     
  13. Tekniqs

    Tekniqs Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    4,911
    Likes Received:
    4
    well ya, it has to stand within reason lol. I'm sure Pac wouldn't ask for a split of 90-10 or some dumb sh!t like that.

    My thing is, if Pac wins the first fight, Floyd will bend over backwards to get that rematch. I'm sure his ego won't let Pac have the victory. That's what I mean about Pac being able to call all the shots. In order for Floyd to have his 'revenge', he'll have to abide by what Pac wants to make the fight happen.
     
  14. HoldMyBeer

    HoldMyBeer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2010
    Messages:
    12,346
    Likes Received:
    6
    well I guess we can keep dreaming
    we've only had about 5 years to organize this fantasy fight, it stands to reason we've evolved after that time and can talk about the rematch too :good
     
  15. Tekniqs

    Tekniqs Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    4,911
    Likes Received:
    4
    ya man, it's always cool to talk about the fight when there's sensible heads on both sides. I just hate it when trolls on both sides tarnish legitimate discussions regarding a possible fight. Anyhoo, I think if the fight does get made, no matter the outcome there will be a rematch. Too much money to be made.
    Unless of course we get an Apollo Creed/Drago scenario lol. And HOPEFULLY no one wants that.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.