Chris Eubank Sr vs Gennady Golovkin At MW

Eubank would outbox him fairly easily.

And i think Golovkin is a great top talent but he's fought nobody as good as Nigel Benn, Micheal Watson, Malinga, or anyone like Rocchigiani.


When he beats some big names then perhaps it would sway my opinion but look at the guys he's faced so far


Rubio, Geale, Adama, Stevens, Macklin, Ishida, Rosado, and Proksa.

 

Who cares. GGG is unproven while Eubank defo proved himself and found his level which was above average world class. GGG is right now just another fad in boxing fighting chumps, but I do like him a lot and think he will go far. Maybe.

 

GG is better technically, Eubank is a better athlete, much stronger, better chin and a bigger puncher.

Eubank wins by robbery decision.

 

This

 

Eubank. Im amazed at how overrated Golovkin is based on fighting nobody at all.

 

Eubank was out boxed by Collins twice, and drew with Benn and Close.

Hardly the stuff of a boxing master. GGG looks special, and the way he fights, boxer types can't shine.

 

At the moment I would go with Eubank, but I reserve the right to change my opinion further down the line.

The important thing now is that Golovkin gets the chance to prove how good he really is.

 

When GGG beats someone worth a damn and not glass chinned Geale, or a guy who didn't even want to fight in Rubio, then when can compare him to Eubank...

Folks need to get off this guys sack, until he beats someone worthwhile and not some bum, tomato can....

 

Tell me who has GGG beaten to be compared to Eubank?????:-(

 

Geale was the champ. Hardly a can.

Anyway, it's not Gennady's fault that nobody wants a piece of him.