Bob Foster vs Michael Moore

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by 2piece, Dec 30, 2014.


  1. 2piece

    2piece Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,995
    278
    Feb 14, 2014
    I can't imagine this one going the distance.

    I want to say Foster because he bit better opposition at LH.

    Although Moorer had more success at Heavy.

    However I will go with Bob Foster.

    12 rounds at 175, who's your pick?
     
  2. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,819
    6,568
    Dec 10, 2014
    Yes

    Bob foster would beat up the Super Heavyweight leftist American film maker.
     
  3. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,362
    8,746
    Oct 8, 2013
    ^ lol thought same thing
     
  4. 2piece

    2piece Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,995
    278
    Feb 14, 2014
    Ha forgot the second R
     
  5. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    Can anyone name a Light Heavyweight of the last 50 years who had the same punching power as Moorer when stepping up to Heavyweight??
     
  6. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,537
    Jul 28, 2004
    Are you implying that Moorer was a puncher at heavyweight? If you are, I'd suggest that MM left ALL his power at lightheavy...he certainly wasn't a punching force at heavyweight.
     
  7. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,537
    Jul 28, 2004
    Foster hit harder than Moorer at 175...moved up to heavyweight and it was as though he had no punch to begin with....same with Moorer.
     
  8. Jester

    Jester Active Member Full Member

    885
    450
    Jul 27, 2014
    At 175, I can't picture Moorer beating Foster. I'd say Foster by knockout.
     
  9. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,564
    Nov 24, 2005
    He had plenty of power at heavyweight.
     
  10. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    Yeah I am implying that, of course he had power at heavyweight.
     
  11. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,537
    Jul 28, 2004
    Moorer couldn't even force a kd of a famously weakened Evander Holyfield in his title winning bout....he must have hit George Foreman with everything but the kitchen sink and never came remotely close to even staggering George...he wasn't that good a puncher at all at heavyweight. Besides Bert Cooper and Frans Botha....(an attrition beatdown), where did he impress with his power at heavyweight? He was one of the least effective punchers of the champions/title holders at heavyweight.
     
  12. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,677
    2,556
    Oct 18, 2004
    Foster kayoes Moorer in three rounds.
     
  13. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    So basically you're saying he couldn't hurt two granite chinned all time greats??

    He got Alex Stewart out of there, a feat George Foreman couldn't do. Who said he was a monster puncher at heavyweight? Name me another light heavyweight of recent times who could punch like him at heavyweight?
     
  14. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,564
    Nov 24, 2005
    I think he had very good power but he fought began fighting more cautious because he had his own chin issues, certainly after the Cooper fight as he moved towards a shot at the big title.
     
  15. impacted

    impacted Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,892
    1,269
    Dec 6, 2011
    Don't just say ''besides him and him'' as though they never really happened. Moorer could bang at heavyweight. Cooper and Alex Stewart were legitimate KO's.
    Moorer's chin never really stood up too well, but his punching power was 100% real. At 175 and heavy.