So is the hypocrite you just quoted, a 2 yr old post was dug up and he posted on it with a similar post to the troll that dug it up.
I wish I could dig up the ''Green was seriously doing everything to lose'' thread where a fool thought Green threw the Tarver fight. But it has mysteriously disappeared.:think
We all know that Canine Green paid off the Drews kid and bought his WBA 175 lb trinket. That is without question, it is public record. I will pose the following question. Could canine Green have defeated the Drews kid if he didn't pay him to lose ? Thoughts ?
Drews was always a c class fighter! Even if green didn't pay him off, which it's pretty clear he did, i reckon green beats him comfortable
Drews was paid off there's never been any doubts about this to all that watched the fight...... One of the most blatant acts in boxings recent history.
Given that 3 of Greens 5 losses were to southpaws if Drew's had actually tried to win he would have given him plenty of trouble.
Public record you claim? If it was public record you would be able to provide a reference. When you fail to do that. As I'm sure you will. You claim becomes just another of your fabrications :yep
Drews had a back problem and has never had another fight.green picked him at the right time.u guys just over reach and are haters..much like that noob in jail.
In actual fact drews announced his retirement before the fight with green. Then not long after came out of retirement for the city to surf effort he put up against $$Green$$