How good was Hasim Rahman ??

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ideafix12, Jan 11, 2015.

  1. ideafix12

    ideafix12 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2010
    Messages:
    1,999
    Likes Received:
    852
    Thoughts
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  2. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Messages:
    50,735
    Likes Received:
    24,344
    I think he was better than average. Beat Lewis, Sanders and was probably robbed against Tua. Gave some galant losing efforts to good men as well. Not a great fighter by any means but one with a respectable career. Probably comparable to some of the alphabet champions of the 1980s.
     
  3. Frankel

    Frankel Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2015
    Messages:
    531
    Likes Received:
    30
    my opinion Rahman was nothing more than a journeyman. in fact i could list a dozen journeyman from the 70s who beat him easily
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,453
    Likes Received:
    26,959
    Having acknowledged his limitations, he actually impresses me as a versatile fighter.

    He beat significant contenders with a wide range of different styles, including boxer punchers, sluggers, and cuties.
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  5. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Messages:
    34,221
    Likes Received:
    5,874
    I'd argue that, while he wasn't a special fighter, Hasim gets sold a little short these days. He was a solid world-class guy and you can't knock his level of competition. He fought most of the top guys from the tail end of Lennox's reign up to Wlad and Povetkin and, ultra shot versions aside, generally acquitted himself well.

    I find it interesting that a guy like Mercer seems to be held in higher regard than Rahman now considering Hasim has the better wins and achieved more.
     
    Boxingfan2 and cross_trainer like this.
  6. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Messages:
    10,647
    Likes Received:
    9,463
    Have to agree with you buddy, as always:good

    He was good HW, strong, hard-hitting, good jab, he also had underestimated defensive skills which helped him against hard hitters like Sanders and Tua.

    Rahman's main flaws were his speed and also his predictability,

    I like him and he was involved in some exciting fights - Lennox, Holyfield, Maskaev, Sanders etc.

    Unfortunately, Rahman faded very quickly and in his last 2 fights he looked like 70 y.o. former boxer.
     
  7. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2013
    Messages:
    10,974
    Likes Received:
    5,412
    Not bad not great. He had some assets but also had some drawbacks.
     
  8. Bullet

    Bullet Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2014
    Messages:
    484
    Likes Received:
    10
    Would say that he was a big puncher, something that people don't talk much about Rahman, you heard about Frank Bruno being a big puncher and not about Rahman for example.
     
    Moggy94 likes this.
  9. ticar

    ticar Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,264
    Likes Received:
    764
    one of the strongest and most powerful hw ever.he's not very skilled,but for example he would dwarf joe louis.6 inches in reach and so much power and strength.
     
  10. Frankel

    Frankel Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2015
    Messages:
    531
    Likes Received:
    30
    i would have to disagree with you "That he was a Big Puncher".. i don't think he was that big of a puncher. Rahman's record shows that whenever he fought anyone rated above Class C other than Lennox Lewis and Corrie Sanders, he could never knocked out them fighters. He KOd unknown tomato can fighters, but never fighters rated in the Top 50
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  11. N_ N___

    N_ N___ Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2014
    Messages:
    6,204
    Likes Received:
    93
    His best performance must've been against Kali Meehan. He looked like an absolute monster in that fight
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  12. VVMM

    VVMM Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,372
    Likes Received:
    343
    Rahman had 62 fights and only one remarkable (lucky) ko win (Lewis).
    Sanders was a bum.
    It's not too impressive "list".
     
  13. SILVER SKULL 66

    SILVER SKULL 66 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2013
    Messages:
    2,714
    Likes Received:
    46
    He was fair i guess :huh, watching him KO Sanders was awesome, since Rahman was American, i thought he was robbed against Tua which ****ed me off, and Johnny Ruiz smacked him around too, he was in a few exciting fights, his 2 fights against Maskaev were both exciting matches...

    Not a lot of talk about his lottery punch KO, against Lewis since he was annihilated in the rematch, :yep
     
  14. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2004
    Messages:
    23,660
    Likes Received:
    2,138

    this is about the way I see it
     
  15. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2013
    Messages:
    10,974
    Likes Received:
    5,412
    The Ruiz fight is the most troubling thing on his resume IMO. He should have beaten Ruiz easily if he was even half as good as his fans thought he was but he looked absolutely clueless and could not figure out how to handle Ruiz' clutching style. Where his supposed super strength in that fight?