Bermane Stiverne vs. Deontay Wilder speculation & discussion

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 2, 2014.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Constable

    Constable Boxing Junkie banned

    7,911
    2
    Oct 7, 2014
    yes i had time to study some tapes on him and the kid is flawed he struggled with a journeyman (forgot his name)and got a lucky shot he was losing on points and he has been badly hurt by a bum

    stiverne has never impressed me
     
  2. conraddobler

    conraddobler Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,853
    148
    Mar 7, 2010
    yeah, that's fair.
     
  3. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,179
    15,970
    Jul 25, 2014
    can't force anyone to do anything, and would prefer it if he didnt make it official either way, the guy isn't exactly a picks guru.
     
  4. bigbeatbaby

    bigbeatbaby Active Member Full Member

    928
    1
    Apr 29, 2012
  5. conraddobler

    conraddobler Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,853
    148
    Mar 7, 2010

    a fighter named ____ struggled with a journeyman and was ____ hurt by a bum could apply to many good and great fighters, including .... well, you know.
     
  6. Bustajay

    Bustajay Feel the Steel/Balls Deep Full Member

    32,869
    12,807
    Dec 9, 2012
    :rofl:D
    If he was MVC he would had already talked about how great Floyd is by now....right:think
    :smoke
     
  7. Constable

    Constable Boxing Junkie banned

    7,911
    2
    Oct 7, 2014
    who has stiverne beat other then chris ?
     
  8. conraddobler

    conraddobler Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,853
    148
    Mar 7, 2010
    His record is thin, but he has skills. I understand that you can't detect skills because you base things off who-beat-who. That's fine. You have a certain kinship with "bailey".
     
  9. JacK Rauber

    JacK Rauber Unbourboned by what has been Full Member

    11,862
    14,571
    Oct 20, 2013
    Good ****ysis, Sugar. I can't argue with you assessment. I personally believe it is a pick ‘em fight for the reasons you mention. What is interesting is you keep hearing about Wilder’s chin being suspect. Why is that? Has he been rocked? Has this come out in sparring? Generally, where there is smoke there is fire. I’m going to go out on a limb and say Wilder is exposed. Stiverne stops him in the middle rounds.
     
  10. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,727
    3,935
    Jun 13, 2012
    My ****ysis is Stiverne by early KO. Wilder has poor defense, he windmills, and he's not good at using his reach.
     
  11. Jim Jeffries

    Jim Jeffries Ring General banned Full Member

    3,265
    571
    Feb 24, 2013
    I think this will be a fixed fight unfortunately.


    Wilder will win.
     
  12. Vergilius

    Vergilius Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,220
    3
    May 29, 2010
    I agree. I've only watched him vs Arreola, but Stiverne seems very poised and calm in the ring - good balance and reflexes. Looks completely different from all the stumbling brutes that make up most of the division. Still not sure he can beat Wilder - Stiverne is a pretty small guy after all if you take away the flab.
     
  13. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh! Full Member

    73,156
    39,654
    Sep 29, 2012
    No, even if he manages to knock Stiverne out he'll still be the same flawed fighter. Not much will change, he'll always be a KO waiting to happen.
     
  14. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,310
    29,491
    Apr 4, 2005
    22" thighs for a heavyweight as tall as Terrell is thin but Wilder has 18" thighs, 18"! That's mad.

    Lewis had 26" thighs, Marciano at 5'10" and 185lbs had 22" thighs. Hell I'm 5'5" and weight 138lbs and I have 22.5 inch thighs.

    Just checked Lewis had 18" calves, Lewis calves are the same size as Wilders thighs. :scaredas::lol:
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,044
    48,167
    Mar 21, 2007
    :lol:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.