Jeffries got what he deserved ...

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by he grant, Jan 15, 2015.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,429
    9,410
    Jul 15, 2008
    I'd say the Langford Johnson fought was far better than the hog fat, post 32 year old ,half blind version Wills feasted on .. this Langford, with over fifty fights over great opposition was physically in his prime ..
     
  2. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,429
    9,410
    Jul 15, 2008
    You're avoiding the specific w broad based avoidance ..

    Jeffries as champion ducked Johnson, refusing to fight him due to color.

    Jeffries referred to Johnson in in terrible fashion in public constantly along the way.

    Jeffries retired rather than ultimately give Johnson a shot.

    Jeffries came out of retirement to regain the title for the white race and along the way still treated Johnson with terrible disrespect.

    When they fought, Johnson, who remained a gentlemen the entire way, destroyed Jeff in from of the world ..

    That to me is justice.
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,982
    48,059
    Mar 21, 2007
    The 187lb 1914 version that Wills ran into as a veritable novice and with whom he fought a 10 round draw was an absolute beast.

    His 1916 out-pointing of Langford was against a slipping version, but still, Langford would beat Sam McVey (twice), Joe Jeannette (by knockout, something that no other fighter would do to Joe aside from in his third fight), Jeff Clark by knockout, Jim Johnson by knockout and Harry Wills himself, by knockout in the nineteenth round, all that same year.

    I think your characterisation of him as "hog fat" and "half blind" doesn't really tell the story - when Wills beat Langford the first couple of times, he was among the most dangerous fighters in the world. I'd certainly see him as more dangerous than the middleweight Johnson KO'd, up at heavyweight at least.
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,577
    27,222
    Feb 15, 2006
    the version of Langford that Wills beat in their first encounters, was unequivocally better than the version that Johnson beat.
     
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,577
    27,222
    Feb 15, 2006
    Do you regard it as justice when Jess Willard knocked Jack Johnson out, because he had avoided Sam Langford, and treated him shamefully?

    If not, then why do you take a different stance on that?
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,982
    48,059
    Mar 21, 2007
    Surely you take satisfaction in Johnson battering Jeffries though? For all you might respect Jeffries and feel bad for him, surely the sight of him toying with the man that refused to fight him because of his colour while another white champion screams racial insults at him from ringside is a satisfying sight?

    Johnson fought the whole world that day, it must have felt.
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,577
    27,222
    Feb 15, 2006
    I prefer to look at it as a sort of morality tale.

    Almost a latter day fable
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,982
    48,059
    Mar 21, 2007
    I think the thread title is accurate. Jeffries got what he deserved. He deserves to have been a dominant and legendary champion. He deserved to get slapped about by Johnson. Full circle.

    Jeffries should have kicked Johnson's head in in 1904. If he'd done that, guess what.
     
  9. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,432
    Feb 10, 2013
    You dont think those other guys get flak? I hear people talk about robinsons woman beating and monzons murder all the time. I know i bring up corrales and mayweather's various incidents on a semi regular basis. But the fact that other people have beaten their wives is hardly a defense or an excuse for johnson to get a pass and his wife beating was hardly the only negative aspect of his personality. HE turning a blind eye to that as if we cant prove he was an ass is laughable. The sources from both the black and white and foreign press on that fact are legion. His list of antisocial behavioral incidents is a mile long and frankly he revelled in it, which itself illustrates just how antisocial he was. To portray him as some kind of iconoclast or ahead of his time is so ridiculously obtuse it strains credibility. He was no civil rights activist. In fact he single handedly set that cause back nearly 40 yrs. And if he was ahead of his time then he was better representative of morons like michael brown who think they have a free pass to take what they want, try to bully anyone that tries to force them to live by the laws of this society and then ***** about racism when the consequences of their own actions are borne. I have no patience and no time for such people or their misguided defenders. Like I said, Johnson was a great fighter and very difficult match for anyone but my respect for his ability is matched by my disdain for his behavior outside of the ring, which was a reflection of his own hubris, not the society he grew up in.
     
  10. WhyYouLittle

    WhyYouLittle Stand Still Full Member

    1,372
    21
    Jul 13, 2012
    It's a pretty good wrap up but there's a little more to it IMO.

    The fight itself blur the lines between the racist element in the society of the time and Jeffries himself.

    While it's true Jeffries chose to wear the vest of the white supremacist champion and behaved accordingly, denying Johnson his chance, acting smug, condescending, making insulting offers to Johnson and so on (all of it his choice period.), it's also true he was the one who really took one for all the racists. That's literally and also historically. He is remembered as THE white racist champion moreso than Sullivan himself. And the fact that he is the one remembered (not Sullivan, or Tunney, or Loughran, etc. ) is as much fault of the rest of the racist cvnts as is his own. Which is interesting. If from Johnson's perspective he got what he deserved, the inbreds were the ones that really f*cked 'im.
     
  11. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,667
    2,153
    Aug 26, 2004
    :good
     
  12. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,667
    2,153
    Aug 26, 2004
    I often feel bad when an older Great Champion takes a beating from a younger guy. Jeffries was a complete shell of himself as was Johnson when he was beaten by Willard and Louis by Marciano and Ali by Holmes.

    I take no pleasure in seeing an older fighter take a beating as was in the case of B-Hop vs Kov and while I respect Hopkins as a fighter his remarks have often been ignorant, I still felt very bad for him only struggling to survive
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,076
    Jun 2, 2006
    Steve please point out any post of mine that excuses Johnson beating his wife.

    I am an apologist for no one ,I have called Johnson a **** on this forum.
    Jeffries was by no means Mr Clean, he was good to his wife , [most of us are,]but he reneged on gambling debts and was a thorough going racist,who had the courtesies of a gorilla
    . Jeffries constantly referred to Johnson as a ****** and a Skunk Johnson never bad mouthed Jeffries and he had every reason to do so.
    Jeffries refused to shake hands with Johnson before the fight
    and Johnson was waved away when he went over to offer his commiserations after the fight.

    If Johnson was an ****hole ,what was Jeffries?
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,076
    Jun 2, 2006
    I agree with your post[which may surprise you,] but boxing is formulated on, "the king is dead ,long live the King!"
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,076
    Jun 2, 2006
    In 1904 he probably would have ,and where would he be ranked today ?
    Top ten I would guess.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.