Jeffries got what he deserved ...

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by he grant, Jan 15, 2015.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,726
    29,076
    Jun 2, 2006
    Your post blames Johnson for the turn around in the way Australians perceived him.This article suggests they had a skewed view of him from the start and when they realised the reality ,there opinion changed drastically .You can say Johnson should have had enough sense to keep clear of white p***y ,but that implies that he was only accepted if he conformed to the mores of the day.

    Johnson's initial experiences matched his optimism. Although he battled seasickness throughout the trip, he was sad to leave the "charming friends" he had met aboard the Sonoma. Johnson later recalled, "For the first time in my life, I was pleased to find myself in a group in which we did not take into account people's color."2 When he arrived in Sydney on 24 January 1907, the city's white sportsmen embraced him with open arms, and local newspapers declared that he would not be forced to confront a Jim Crow color line in Australia.

    Despite this warm welcome, Australian fans had more in common with their white American counterparts than they cared to admit. As they viewed Johnson through the distorted lens of blackface minstrelsy, he appeared more an exotic curiosity than a man. " He has a genial face," the Sydney Truth described, "somewhat babyish looking and of the type of the little ****s who may be seen devouring watermelons in a well-known American picture."3 Since the mid-nineteenth century, minstrelsy had been a staple in Australian theaters, providing white settlers with a glimpse of U.S. racial politics. Australians had eagerly embraced this U.S. import, adapting both its imagery and its language to their local scene. So-called "******" bands played on Australian steamers, and street minstrels paraded outside neighborhood pubs dressed in loud suits complete with oversized collars and coattails.4 When the dandified heavyweight arrived, white Australians immediately cast him as a minstrel. Wrapped up in the sentimental tropes of blackface comedy, Johnson, for the time being, seemed harmless.

    Though geographically distant and demographically different, the two nations shared the same underlying logics of race and the body. First forged in the performances of blackface minstrels, these links proliferated with the expansion of mass sporting culture at the turn of the twentieth century. By the time Johnson reached Sydney, the athletic body had become an important medium through which white men expressed their mutual interest in the maintenance of global white domination. The image of an ideal citizen was a muscular white male. This focus on the physical provided an easy justification for the exclusion of people of color from mainstream politics and society. Their dark skin and exotic bodies became the tangible proof of their unworthiness for full citizenship rights and self-determination. It marked them as contaminating threats to the health of the white body politic"



    "The two met in February 1907, when Toy went to Johnson's stage performance at Queen's Hall to inquire about her mother's missing gold pin. Someone in the heavyweight's entourage had apparently walked off with it during a drunken night at the Grand Pacific. Pressed for time, Johnson invited Toy to drop by his training headquarters at the Sir Joseph Banks Hotel in Botany so that they could resolve the matter. Toy first went to Johnson's hotel accompanied by her stepfather. However, it took a second trip out to Botany with her mother to retrieve the pin. During their visit Johnson invited the two women to watch him train. At just over six feet tall and two hundred pounds, Johnson's taut physique left both Toy and her mother mesmerized as they watched him, stripped to the waist, sparring in the ring. Despite the social taboo against the intermingling of black men and white women, Toy took a liking to Johnson, calling him "a great pugilist and a well-made man." Even Toy's mother had to admit that he was "a beautiful man." When Johnson offered to escort the two ladies home, Toy's mother allowed him to ride along in their sulky.28
    Enamored with Johnson, Toy visited his hotel numerous times. She reportedly accompanied him on carriage rides, watched him spar, and waved mosquitoes away from him as the two nestled together on the hotel veranda. He gave her the pet name "Baby" and she called him "Jack." When the Tivolians, a group of Aussie chorus girls from the Tivoli Music Hall, visited Johnson's training camp, Toy stood next to the pugilist in a group photo. Johnson had his arm around her shoulder while she held his walking stick. Rumors began circulating about Johnson's escapades with Toy and the Tivolians.29
    They continued to meet. Toy apparently visited Johnson's hotel room at all hours of the day and night-so much so that her stepfather accused her of disgracing the family and kicked her out of the house, locking the door behind her. She finally had to call on a local constable to convince her stepfather to let her return home"



    You may say Johnson should have had enough sense to steer clear of white p***y but that just reinforces the stance that you are ok as long as you are a docile black and don't look at our women.
     
  2. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,429
    9,413
    Jul 15, 2008
    It's clearly a touchy subject as this is now a debate over race when I simply meant it as debate between two men. That being said, in my opinion, to character asssssinate Johnson based on reports of those that did not like him or to discount the unprecedented racial hatred he suffered or the primary reason why is simply not being honest. There is , again, a reason why Joe Louis' management's number one rule for Joe was NO WHITE WOMEN , EVER..in a photo or seen out alone with ... They saw the wheels it set in motion w Jack Johnson. Anyone that does not think that 99 percent of Johnsons problems did not result initially from this and the events, long and short term that it triggered are kidding themselves. There is a reason why Branch Ricky selected Jackie Robinson for baseball in 47, forty years post Johnson, and his rules. No matter what, do not antagonize or respond to the racism you will receive. You had to play nice and Jack Johnson was not that guy. He did what he wanted.
     
  3. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Of course Mcvey is " trying " to tear down Booker T. He will say anything to protect his wife beating idol. It's transparent.

    What will he say about WEB?

    W.E.B. DuBois,
    who wrote that “the history of the world is the history, not of individuals, but of
    groups, not of nations, but of races, and he who ignores or seeks to override the race
    idea in human history ignores and overrides the central thought of all history,
    Johnson had no patience for the concept of “linked fate.” Johnson thought of himself
    as an individual unconstrained by race. Indeed, the fighter showed little loyalty to other
    Blacks and “had neither faith, confidence nor respect for colored professional men.

    After winning the heavyweight title, he refused to fight any of the other men who had
    been denied the chance to contend for the championship because of the color line,
    saying, “I won’t box any of these colored boys now. . . . I’ll retire still the only colored
    heavyweight champ. Even after retiring, he resented the success of Joe Louis and
    other Black boxers. The Black press disapproved of Johnson’s independence and
    criticized the fact that most of his friends and boxing associates were White men,
    commenting that “when [Johnson] turned away from his own people to seek associates
    among whites and found them frequently among the most disreputable, there was a
    natural revulsion on the part of colored men.”
     
  4. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,432
    Feb 10, 2013
    This comment in my opinion encapsulates this argument perfectly. You say "based on reports of those that did not like him..." This totally ignores the fact that A LOT of people had a legitimate reason for disliking Johnson. Johnson's apologists on here want to white washing his failings as a human being and pretend that anyone who disliked him did so because of his skin and no other reason, and that any talk of the more unsavory side of his character is nothing but "character assassination." So basically this massive cross section of people who didnt like Johnson gets totally lumped with a bunch of racists, regardless of whether they were white americans, black americans, french, canadian, british, spanish, swiss, belgian, argentine, mexican, cuban, etc etc. Its a pretty weak argument. Ive submitted, and maintained that when trouble follows a guy like Johnson its not just a coincidence or character assassination. Ive already shown and can continue to show that Johnson was often welcomed with open arms in many places, regardless of his reputation in the United States so he was getting the benefit of the doubt. However, it didnt take long for any locale to tire of him and his antics. That right there should be enough to tell anyone not blinded by bias or hero worship that the guys had problems that extended well beyond some massive world wide conspiracy to keep him oppressed.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,984
    48,062
    Mar 21, 2007
    I'm thinking of locking this thread, but I won't if you gents are keen to continue.

    Let me know if you have any objections to the thread being closed.
     
  6. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,432
    Feb 10, 2013
    Why would you lock it?
     
  7. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,429
    9,413
    Jul 15, 2008
    No it does not. You seem to completely discount his reality and judge him in a vacuum as if the behavior he demonstrated to some degree post Reno pre-prison was not impacted significantly by what he was forced to uniquely experience. It's nice he was welcomed with welcome arms in many places .. who cares if the man was already damaged, disturbed, had a shot nervous system, doubted the sincerity of those making the offer based on endless previous experiences, ect. Johnson was not without flaws but a huge impact on his character, decisions ect resulted from the unprecedented issues he was forced to deal with for years based on the color of the women he slept with. Like his behavior was not impacted by trumped up racial charges decided to be utilized especially to single out Johnson, to live on the run in exile and struggle to make a living as his athletic prime dripped away ? Are you serious that this would not impact any human being, coming after all he went through previously ? I don't even get your reasoning at all .. In addition, a ton of the references you are referring to who portray him in certain light had their judgement crafted in the same mentality as Jeffries. I guess I see this in a different light ..
     
  8. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,432
    Feb 10, 2013

    Oh brother. So he has no responsibility for his actions, taking advantage of people, beating people, essentially stealing from them, refusing to abide by the law, pimping, etc etc. Good lord. Yeah, lets blame everyone else for Johnson's failings except himself. Lets totally ignore ALL of the times the guy was arrested BEFORE his first marriage to a white woman and long before his marriage to a white woman became public common knowledge. Lets just pretend that his name wasnt constantly in the papers prior to that for running out on debts, crashing his car, racing, speeding, assault, etc. and just pretend all of his troubles started later on. The problem with that argument is that it is based on fantasy or ignoring the simple facts or not knowing the facts. Either way the argument is flawed and worthless. Just as the argument that Johnson experienced so much hardship and racism as a child that he just rebelled against society and became a misfit and thus society, not Johnson, bears the blame for his actions. In reality Johnson came from a working class family,w was relatively well educated for the times especially for a black child in the south and he was very open about the fact that he didnt experience a lot of racism growing up and actually spent quite a lot of time with accepting white children and families. In fact his troubles all seemed to start after he won the championship and let fame and fortune go to his head. Feeling that now he could do whatever he wanted (although I have found reference in the Galvaston papers to a black John Arthur Johnson and his brother being arrested at about the same age as Jack would have been at the time, so its entirely possible he always had an anti-social bent. But the fact is that from almost the instant he won the championship he started acting like he could do whatever the hell he wanted to whoever the hell he wanted and seemed to actively court trouble. It wasnt until two years after he won the championship that he married Duryea and that was in secret. By the time he married her he had already been arrested twice for beating women and had beaten Duryea brutally. The issue of his marriage did not become a major issue until Johnson married Lucille Cameron in 1912 and that became a major controversy less because he had married a white woman and more because at the time he married her he was charged with kidnapping her by her mother and it was deemed that he married her to protect himself from those charges. If you go back and actually read the press at the time you will several editorials which basically say "if she wants to marry a black man then she gets what she deserves" Not exactly complimentary to blacks but hardly the outrage that followed several of his earlier brushes with the law that had nothing to do with race. And again, it wasnt just one single thing that he did. It was that he was constantly in the papers for something negative. At least three assaults, smuggling, at least two or three lawsuits for breaking contracts and several other instances of refusal to pay for items or services rendered, several instances of speeding, car racing, and car wrecks, and then came the charge that he absconded with this womans daughter and married her without her mothers consent. After literally years, not months but years, of reading about his antics the pot boiled over, and people today who clearly dont have all of the facts and want to take this one situation totally out of context have the nerve to judge that one instance in a vacuum by the standards of today? Please.
     
  9. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    8,874
    Oct 8, 2013
    Why did Johnson return to America? A man as sophisticated as Johnson one would think could have enjoyed Europe and stayed away from America where he was a pariah? Was he homesick?
     
  10. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,577
    27,223
    Feb 15, 2006
    Homesick, and perhaps running out of money.
     
  11. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,432
    Feb 10, 2013
    Because he became pariah in europe as well
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,726
    29,076
    Jun 2, 2006
    That and a little thing called WW1:lol:
     
  13. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,577
    27,223
    Feb 15, 2006
    We don't seem to be finding much common ground here, or even narrowing the issues down.

    Johnson seems to be as divisive today as he was a hundred years ago.
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,726
    29,076
    Jun 2, 2006
    I don't think this is going anywhere now
    .Its just stuff being repackaged and repeated. A thread that has run its course, imo.
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,726
    29,076
    Jun 2, 2006

    This is Dubois' opinion of Washington
    .
    Harvard educated NAACP founder
    This content is protected
    became Washington’s main opponent through. Despite initially being a follower of Washington’s
    This content is protected
    criticised him for not promoting protest, referring to him as ‘The Great Accommodator’.
    This content is protected
    argued that Washington and his ‘Tuskegee Machine’ would damn African Americans to permanent inferiority.
    This content is protected
    instead proposed constantly challenging whites for immediate social and political equality, through a ‘talented tenth’, a group of elite blacks that would represent and prove African American’s worth as a whole.

    You really are a cretin aren't you:lol:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.