Explain the Ducking History of Great Fighters Part I: Roy Jones

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by KillSomething, Jan 23, 2015.


  1. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    Whats that got to do with the question :huh
     
  2. conraddobler

    conraddobler Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,853
    148
    Mar 7, 2010
    GGG versus john Ruiz. Think GGG walks down and sparks 230 pound Ruiz cold? Or does GGG outpoint him using lateral movement and a jab? Picture the two standing next to one another. This isn't 160 pound Daniel Geale running around the ring.
     
  3. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    75,567
    40,095
    Jan 22, 2015
    Dariousk ducked roy, because he didn't want to fight in the states. It was a bad buisness decision because he later dropped the belt to Gonzalez. Could have been paid alot of money to get beat by roy!
     
  4. conraddobler

    conraddobler Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,853
    148
    Mar 7, 2010
    This is rather funny. As evidence of how ordinary of an accomplishment this was you bring up a guy that was born in 1863.

    KillSomething, you're too much!
     
  5. KillSomething

    KillSomething Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,126
    57
    Dec 1, 2009
    There are numerous others guys who won THE heavyweight title or a version of it who at one point in their career with a day-before weigh-in could have made 140 or lower.

    Hell, wasn't Langford a featherweight? :lol:

    Point is you're talking about a guy who weighed 170+ to start his career gaining 20lb over the course of over 10 years and eventually fighting a heavyweight who was not even one of the top 4. It's been done and outdone before, many times (without roids). Roy is not special for that.
     
  6. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006

    So what if you are right? Is it still not a great feat?


    Day before weigh ins have been going for how long now? How come we don't have any former 154 lb fighters beating top 5 heavies???

    Lets also look at who Fitzsimmons beat, Jim Corbett was around 185 pounds, the size difference was not near that of Jones-Ruiz or even close to Lennox Lewis- Roy Jones.
     
  7. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    Because you tried to make out Ruiz as being such a bad champion for losing to Toney and Jones jr who were both former super middles yet Toney Had success at HW..Ruiz lost to two Atg great fighters yet he was able to beat Holyfield ..So what does that say about Holyfield? Guess he's a scrub as well for losing to Toney too right ?
     
  8. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006
    Did Spinks fight at 154? or was he a former MW champ? Just a simple yes or no...

    Also, you have agreed in the past that Spinks had great timing, and that he would not have been able to move up and beat THE champion in most other eras... Why is it you back track? I don't think there is much intellectual honesty on your part Rico.



    Again, how many were former 154 lb fighters, and how many would be going up against a giant that happens to be probably the best h2h fighter ever at his best?


    I have seen you post enough to know you do know the history of boxing well, and have impressed me at times, but you simply hate Roy too much to give him any kind of credit, and part of me believes you just do it to get a rise.
     
  9. KillSomething

    KillSomething Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,126
    57
    Dec 1, 2009
    ...Jon Ruiz. He wasn't a great or even good fighter. He was terrible, and he was stylistically made for Jones aside from being 33lb larger.

    Ezzard Charles beat Joe Louis who weighed 34lb more than he did. Sam Langford was the size of Rigondeaux when he went pro. Greb, Fitzsimmons, and a ton of other fighters routinely fought guys much larger than they were. Fitz got battered by Jeffries who was MASSIVELY larger than he was, and that was only because he broke his hands while giving Jeffries a savage, damaging beating.

    You just can't compare Roy vs Ruiz to almost any of the accomplishments of other fighters, even the ones who failed (Conn, etc.). It's not even in the same league. Sure, beating a guy who is bigger than you is better than beating a guy who is the same size. It's a LOT more impressive if the bigger guy is a good fighter, not just a lump. Does Louis get massive credit for handling Tony Galento? Would Kovalev get massive credit for beating Butterbean?

    Give it a rest. Ruiz was no good, he wasn't that big, and Jones cherrypicked him and went around talking about how no other fighter did what he did, even though it's patently false regardless of whether Ruiz was the real champ or even good.
     
  10. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,235
    Mar 7, 2012
    KillSomething,

    No, I don't consider any other HW having a great win over Ruiz.

    But again, Roy was a 34 year old LHW, who'd had 50 fights, and who was outweighed by 30 pounds.

    So Roy obviously deserves more credit.

    It was a great win whichever way you slice it.

    Everyone's circumstances are different, and Ruiz wasn't a chump.

    Again, if Ruiz had a paper title, then what the hell did Sanders have? :lol:

    You're pi$$ed that Roy fought Ruiz, but have questioned why he didn't fight Sanders?

    :patsch

    Do you seriously think that Roch would have brought a bigger challenge to Roy?

    There's no way you'd have rated that win.

    Why would you have?

    Roch was a good-very good fighter.

    But nothing more.


    You don't think Roy would have handled a guy like Glen in his 20's?

    How many more times?

    At times, HBO crucified him. When it came to Roy, they were completely unbiased. You can't even argue against that. When Roy fought Frazier they were pi$$ed. So you know that when they backed him, they were telling the truth. Now why would you doubt the word of Kerry Davis? Davis was the VP for HBO. When he gave reports to the media, that he was trying to bring Dariusz to the U.S. there was absolutely no reason not to believe him. Again, you can't have it both ways. When HBO were angry, they publicly criticised Roy. So again, they weren't at all biased.

    Has it not registered yet why I've mentioned Evander? You keep saying that Roy chose the path of least resistance. You've mentioned it numerous times. So if that was really true, why on earth would he have took his advisor to Atlanta, to meet with Jim Thomas and Evander? That link, even though you've never mentioned Evander, blows your biased opinion straight out of the water.

    With regards to Liles, what do you mean I may have a point? :patsch
    I've shown you a video, and a link. In the video Roy states that he offered Liles seven figures. Jim Lampley stated that Frankie had never made that amount of money before. Again, if HBO hadn't have had proof of such offers, they would never have aired the interview. Is that not obvious to you? In the link, Jack O'Halloran spoke of their time together. He gave him a home, he got the best out of him, and he was absolutely convinced that Frankie would have knocked Roy out. He said that Frankie had a great fight lined up against Roy, but he blew it by asking for more. He then labelled him foolish, and ended up leaving him. Again, what more do you want? We don't need to know the specifics. Because we know two things:

    1. It was the biggest offer that Frankie had ever had.

    2. If it hadn't have been a great offer, O'Halloran wouldn't have said what he did in the interview.

    So stop digging your heels in, and admit that Roy didn't duck him.

    Look, I spent a lot of time on the other thread. You dismissed everything that I posted, and you didn't answer about 5 of my posts. Yet you're asking me to upload everything again?

    My posts aren't scattered at all.

    If you look at my first few posts to Rumsfield, everything is in order, from when he turned pro.

    1. Again, I've posted plenty of links that have gone hand in hand with my logical opinions.

    2. You have to look from Roy's perspective, and not just from the perspective of the fighters that wanted to face him.

    Examples: Roy didn't want to fight Collins. Collins did not want to fight Calzaghe. Calzaghe did not want to fight Froch. Froch does not want to fight Degale. Now did those guys have valid reasons why they didn't want to fight, or were they scared duckers?

    3. If you think that Roy ducked certain guys because he feared losing, then look at who he fought instead throughout his career.

    4. Roy was obligated to fight mandatories from three organisations after he'd unified.

    5. Roy beat fighters after Toney, who were better than Glen Johnson.

    Like I've mentioned on the other thread, list all of the guys that Roy missed, and then ask yourself three questions.

    1. Were the guys who he missed, BETTER than the best guys who he fought?

    2. Would any of them have brought bigger challenges than Roy's biggest fights?

    3. Look at the guys who Roy would have fought under different circumstances. Dariusz, (in the U.S.) Evander, Liles and a Hopkins rematch. You've seen the links. Were those guys not better than Collins, Nunn and Roch etc?


    With regards to question 2, I'll give you a few examples.

    Fighting Joe Calzaghe just weeks from his 40th birthday, was a bigger challenge than fighting a faded Nunn, at 28.

    Fighting John Ruiz at 34, and being outweighed by over 30 pounds, was a bigger challenge than fighting Collins at 27.

    Burning muscle at almost 35, to fight Tarver at LHW, was a bigger challenge than fighting a guy like Roch at 29.
     
  11. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,235
    Mar 7, 2012
    Eubank was a very good-great fighter.

    But a fight was never viable.

    With regards to Eubank's ranking, you'd have to go and look at the different ratings.

    The Ring magazine didn't have ratings for the WBO.

    But I think that Eubank would have been considered a top fighter in his division.

    But when both guys were at MW, Roy briefly held the IBF, while Eubank was in Britain with the WBO.

    During Roy's reign at SMW, Eubank lost twice to Collins, then fought at LHW.

    During Roy's reign at LHW, Eubank lost to Calzaghe at SMW, and fought at CW.
     
  12. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,235
    Mar 7, 2012
    :lol:
     
  13. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,235
    Mar 7, 2012
    How many people have done it in Roy's era?

    List me all the names.
     
  14. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,235
    Mar 7, 2012
    1. Nobody is disputing the great accomplishments of the great fighters of yesteryear.

    2. Ruiz had a horrible, ugly style. He was truly awful to watch. But he was effective. To say that he wasn't even good, is a gross exaggeration. Evander still had a bit left in the tank when they fought three times. If Ruiz hadn't have been good, he'd have clearly lost all of those fights. Many people think that Evander was robbed against Valuev years later. Ruiz had a few decent wins on his resume. He beat Evander, Johnson, Rahman, Quendo and Golota. A HW that wasn't good, would not have been able to have beaten those guys.

    3. How could Ruiz have been a cherry pick, when Evander had been his initial target?
     
  15. KillSomething

    KillSomething Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,126
    57
    Dec 1, 2009
    OK, so you're basically saying that Roy was on an IEP at heavyweight and didn't have to do as much as other heavyweights to get credit. This is where we really differ in opinion.

    Sanders? A title he won from Wladimir Klitschko as opposed to a paper title that was tossed aside by Lennox Lewis. How is it hard to grasp what makes a title significant? It's the champ that makes the title. If the champ is just a paper champ, the title isn't a big deal.

    Even beating Sanders or Byrd wouldn't be a big deal to me. I just don't think Roy could even beat them (and Roy didn't think so either, or he wouldn't have taken 1/5 of the money to drop down and face Tarver).

    Than who? DelValle, Harding, Byrd, Johnson, Frazier, Griffin, old McCallum, etc? Of course. Rocchigiani was a solid fighter and a stylistic nightmare for Roy.

    No, I actually don't. I don't buy into the whole "Roy lost 10lb and turned into a shot, sh!tty fighter" narrative. Glen was a stylistic problem for Roy, and he always would have been (even in his journeyman stage).

    I don't think Roy broaching the subject of a potential fight over dinner with Evander can be confused with actually proposing a fight with him. Evander had no reason to fight Roy at that time, for the reason mentioned in your quote and also because he would make many times that sum in a much bigger fight with Lennox. I also don't think Roy would have gone through with the fight (see: Rocchigiani)

    We don't 'know' either of those things. I'm sure there would be more talk about it than this if it was true. Even if it was true, you still have 12 ducks left to explain.

    Roy's Perspective: "If I fight a good fighter, I might lose. If I fight a weak fighter, I will certainly win. I will make decent money either way. I do believe I shall pursue the easier fight."

    Collins retired instead of fighting Calzaghe (his mandatory). That isn't a duck. Calzaghe vacated and moved up to fight an ATG and current p4p fighter rather than face the criticism that would come from taking a fight with Froch (his mandatory), who had done absolutely nothing up to that point and would have been dominated easily. Degale (Froch's mandatory) has already lost to a guy Froch KO'd twice and has no big wins. Froch is about to retire and would prefer to make money fighting an easy fight in Vegas and fulfilling a dream. On top of that, he can get an extension or vacate. Roy...moved up to fight what was left of McCallum and then a long string of nobodies rather than unify with Collins who was coming off wins over Eubank and Benn. That's a duck. He liteally ran away from the fight that everyone wanted to see at 168 to go to 175 and keep fighting nobodies. Not similar to guys at the end of their careers vacating their belts instead of fighting an up-and-comer.


    You realize you're listing fighters Roy didn't fight to justify him not fighting other fighters, right? Like seriously, read that aloud to yourself. Who cares who he would have fought under other circumstances. He fought NONE of those fights.

    Roy had nothing to lose at that point and needed the money.

    Say Roy loses to Ruiz...who cares? He's not a heavyweight. Say he wins. WOW, HE MADE HISTORY!!!! Now say he loses to Collins...you get my point. Risk-reward.

    My god, get off the muscle loss. It was less than 10lb and Tarver would have beaten him at any point in his career. Both Tarver and Rocchigiani were bad style matchups for Roy, as was Glen Johnson. Roy had to fight Tarver, just like he had to fight Rocchigiani. The difference is the WBC wasn't gonna let Roy bankrupt them twice.