Roman Gonzalez vJimmy Wilde,Miguel Canto,Pascual Perez -who would do best in losing?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Jan 23, 2015.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,942
    47,984
    Mar 21, 2007
  2. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,767
    8,292
    Feb 11, 2005
    Canto, methinks.

    :bbb
     
  3. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    :nono
     
  4. Quick Cash

    Quick Cash Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,718
    351
    Jul 12, 2007
    Jimmy Wilde had the same prescient understanding of distance; just as defensively difficult, if not even more so. I'd say that this is as close to a mirror match as can be achieved, given the inherent incongruity of the differing eras' rule sets. Of course, there's no way to really discern which of the two was truly better. The game was far too different in the Atom's day. Wilde wasn't even a flyweight by contemporary standards, often weighing in fully clothed at less than 100 pounds.

    Perez, too, was undersized. He's not the complete fighter Roman is, but if he's lucky, he might last the distance a la Estrada. Though I rather doubt it comes to that.

    Chang would present a good, hard test for Chocolatito, I think.
     
  5. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,464
    Sep 7, 2008
    This thread is a joke!
     
  6. Ted Spoon

    Ted Spoon Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,275
    1,072
    Sep 10, 2005
    Gonzalez would give all of them a tough fight and is in with a real shot of beating Perez - the Argentinian was hittable.

    A bout against Miguel Canto is a purists' dream. The smart pressure and tight defence vs. the roaming footwork and left hand. Though it was a quality fight against Yaegashi, Canto brings the kind of generalship he was sorely lacking. Who would make it their fight?

    Wilde, well, it's difficult to pick any flyweight over him. Once you get past the mystical power for such a tiny man there is that uncanny method of baiting n' punishing. Reporters were bowled over with his sense of distance. This style was forged since he was a kid, in all climates, against bigger men. It was a style entirely his own. Unorthodoxy is often a strength in the ring but Jimmy refined this unique style into one with Benny Leonard type proficiency.

    Pit them in the 1950's and I feel Wilde should edge the rounds with those nimble legs and shotgun blows.
     
  7. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    348
    Jul 13, 2007
    Flea do you think McGrain is serious with this?...I tend to think he is...Haven't really paid enough attention to Gonzalez to comment here...But I found myself agreeing with his take on Hopkins/Braddock...(joking or not). :D
     
  8. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,406
    1,803
    Sep 9, 2011
    if they all lose canto does best.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,942
    47,984
    Mar 21, 2007
    So we're in total agreement that Gonzalez WPTS all of them?
     
  10. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    Pts? He stops Wilde. And maybe Perez.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,942
    47,984
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yes, I secretly think that too but I didn't want to push these people.
     
  12. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    Fascists the lot of them, and those that aren't are reds which is the same thing just in reverse.
     
  13. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    544
    Feb 17, 2010
    tbf, i kind of miss the Soviet Union these days.
     
  14. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    It's times like this I miss sigs.