ray mercer of 96 vs mike tyson of 96 who wins?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by energie, Jan 23, 2015.


  1. energie

    energie Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,510
    22
    Dec 8, 2012
    ray mercer that fought spoon and lewis vs mike tyson that fought bruno and holy in 96 how does it go ?

    my opinion is tyson was notthe same when he came back not even close / my money is on ray mercer to take tysons early on slot and take tyson out late (prime 4 prime different story)

    discuss these guys in 96 against each other
     
  2. SILVER SKULL 66

    SILVER SKULL 66 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,714
    47
    Oct 6, 2013
    Ray would be the underdog, but i like him in this fight, Tyson was too mentally unstable, and unpredictable, and prone to do stupid ****, when things aren't going his way, which is exactly what happens here...

    I like Ray by late stoppage or DQ win...
     
  3. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,467
    Jan 10, 2007
    Tyson.

    Maybe Tyson from 2002-2005 wasn't better than Marion Wilson and Jesse Fergusson, but 96 version clearly was.

    Holyfield beat Mercer convincingly, I scored it 97-92. Yet Mercer won 3 rounds which was very good for him.

    Lewis - yes, it was very close, but you can't ignore other fights, too.

    BTW, Bruno who was KO'd in 3 by Tyson in 1996, KO'd Fergusson in 1 round.
     
  4. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Tyson, because hes simply a better fighter.

    As long as he doesn't gas (which he might), hell beat Mercer handily.

    Mercer was an all round tough punchbag, nothing more, nothing less.
     
  5. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    Yeah and that punchbag went 12 hard rounds against huge punching Lennox Lewis, a feat Tyson wouldn't be able to do in 96.

    If Tyson doesn't blast out Mercy early he's in for a long night and would lose in the later rounds, he wasn't exactly hard to hit in 96.
     
  6. energie

    energie Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,510
    22
    Dec 8, 2012
    agreed :good
     
  7. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,225
    1,636
    Sep 13, 2006
    In 1996, I'd go with Mercer, assuming he got in shape, because an in shape Mercer, the one that fought Lewis, had a great chin, and enough speed, power, and skill to withstand the early storm and then take Mike when he started fading. It would have been a whole lot of fun to watch.
     
  8. clark

    clark Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,250
    71
    Jun 15, 2005
  9. Sangria

    Sangria You bleed like Mylee Full Member

    9,017
    3,841
    Nov 13, 2010
    Mercer would prove tough but Tyson would prove tougher if he was up for this particular fight. He overlooks Mercer like he did Holyfield than it could be a long night.

    Tyson should take it. Mercer was never quite championship material.
     
  10. Savak

    Savak Guest

    The Tyson of 96 takes this. He still had speed at this stage.
     
  11. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,130
    8,572
    Jul 17, 2009

    I fully agree with this assessment. In '96,Mercer would have rode out the massive early storm and capitalised on Tyson's frustration after the seventh round or so.