86-88 tyson vs prime wlad

My money would be on Mike.

 

Muhahahahaha its fun thread. Klitschko never lose to a guy with even close to Tyson height. All his 3 loses was vs big guys. Brewster 1.88 and the other 2 are above 1.90.
If you put Klitschko from 2003 against Mike, then Wlad will lost, but then why not put Tyson from 95 against Klitschko ? Cause 2003 is not prime Wlad.
Wlad from 2007-2012 beat Tyson. Tyson is too small, and not have cardio to beat Wlad.
And Tyson never fought a guy with Klitschko power. He will feel every punch from Klitschko.
Klitschko will tire him and will kill him in late rounds 8-10 KO/TKO victory for Wlad.
BTW, Klitschko is fast enough to hit Tyson, and have the power to KO him. Klitschko is stronger and Tyson cant do a s**** in the inside, oh forget it in the clinch. Klitschko have 20-30pounds advantage and this is pure muscle from Wlad .... How exactly Tyson will do something on Wlad?
Povetkin is +10cm bigger and have + 10cm reach above Tyson and could not do a s**** to Klitschko, and that was not even prime Klitschko ....
How exactly Tyson will go near at Wlad?
And Klitschko chin is not weak, its not even near to weak.
Ten, Ten f**** years with a single KD .....

 

86-88 Tyson would have mopped the floor with Sanders, Brewster and Purrity on the same night.

Tyson sends Wlad into Bolivian inside of 6.

 

And who exactly big and very skilled big man Tyson beat? Cause when he face first guy with brain and good defence he was Knocked out.
Then some delusional fans starting to say he was not prime, oh yeah when he is losing he is not in his prime, what a s**** excuses.
Tyson have a lot of problems with big guys, when Klitschko ever have problem with small guys?

 

Tyson did not do so well versus opponents who could punch him back.

 

I think Povetkin might beat Tyson consider this guy Tyson was fighting was nowhere near as good as Povetkin.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfeAyOOBSog

 

And exactly what ATG has Wlad beaten?

 

Kind of early to say who Klitschko's ATG opponents are but Klitschko did beat Byrd who beat Holyfield and Klitschko did beat Ibragimov who beat Holyfield and Klitschko beat Sam Peter who beat James Toney who beat Holyfield. Of course Holyfield beat Tyson and Holyfield beat Douglas who beat Tyson and Klitschko beat Rahman who beat Lewis who beat Tyson.:hey and Klitschko beat Povetkin who beat Byrd and beat Rahman:yep

 

Oh please Povetkin gets handled.

 

Again I ask, exactly what ATG has Wlad beaten?

 

Where'd you see that? In his book he mentioned being able to do "8 hard rounds" at his best.
I just think Tyson is a H2H nightmare for Wlad. Tyson would bring relentless pressure. Even when he got hit he still kept coming forward. His durability gets underrated, he had to be exhausted to be stopped and he always went out on his shield rather than survive the distance. How much clinching would Wlad be allowed to initiate? Actually that probably doesn't matter because Mike never fought for decisions so deducted points won't mean much.
I see Wlad feeling the pressure and lunging in for a clinch too early and Mike hitting him with something big. Wlad goes down, gets up on wobbly legs and Mike swarms him and finishes him.
I respect Wlad and shake my head at the under-rating he gets but like I said, Tyson is just all wrong for him.

 

Well how come Tyson didn't catch any of those fighters on the Chin?

 

Pulev is nearly 6'4

Tyson isn't even 5'10

can't really compare the two and they have different styles as well.

 

:roflatsch

Well 86-88 Tyson couldn't even mop the floor with Mitch Green.