Its looks like excuses right? Like Tyson prime excuses, when he lose. atsch:yep Guy lose his prime at 23 years .... Its fun tho Holyfield and Lennox was older then Tyson and still school him.
Actually, Holmes had already acheived ATG status well before his 39th birthday. Obviously YDKSAB. Now again I ask, EXACTLY what ATG has Wlad beaten?
Yes but beating a past prime 39year Old holmes, is not beating an ATG version. If Holmes fought like he did everyfight as he did that night, he wouldnt be An ATG. comprehend? I Doubt it, youre as thick as two short planks.
You cant become ATG, when there is 2 brothers, thats kill everyone in their path, get it? This is the difference, no one can beat Wladimir, and no one have chance to become ATG, because of how good Wlas is, get it? And last time, who Tyson beat, who was ATG? 40 years old dead Holmes?
Here is another FACT; on his way up the ranks, Tyson *never* got KTFO'ed by second rate fighters like Purrity and Sanders - as did Wlado. N E V E R FACTS, learn to live with them...
You should have made the voting public, i want to see all the euro****s and white people that voted Wlad.
Yes, same as getting KTFO'ed by the likes of Ross Purrity and Corrie Sanders while in/approaching your "prime" is a sure way to keep you out of the HW top ten all time. :hi:
Never said I thought Wlad would win but this 86-88 Tyson stuff is lunacy. The guy literally didn't fight anyone worth a **** in that time frame. Furthermore his best wins are Spinks and old Holmes. The majority of his losses were to taller guys that could Jab and hit him back. The guy wasn't unbeatable. He wasn't in a tough era either. His opposition in the 90's was laughable save Holyfield and he lost both those fight one by KO and the other by Quittage.
Douglas wasn't second rate as is Purrity and Sanders. EDIT: and what part of the "on his way up the ranks" don't you comprehend?