Sultan Ibragimov v.s Tommy Morrison

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Todd498, Jan 29, 2015.


  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,242
    47,263
    Feb 11, 2005
    Morrison walked a tight rope his entire career to avoid exposure of his chin, stamina and lack of ring sense. He found problems with almost every B-level fighter he faced. 2 of the 3 A-level fighters he faced KO'd him. He ran from the third for the latter rounds, his back turned, his legs Jello, huffing and puffing as he carried the weight of pec implants.

    All the sadder.

    Pure supposition. A great KO puncher in Waldo didn't take him out. Briggs, first class in the powerpunching department, rocked him but paid the price. Whitaker, also with excellent power, couldn't turn the trick. Tommy's power was legit but a bit overrated because it was just about all he had. Lots of guys took lots of those hooks without falling the first time they were hit.

    I'm a big Joe Hipp fan but under no illusions he was world class. The fact that Morrison struggled so mightily with Hipp is hardly an endorsement. Rather it is an indication of Morrison's true class in the sport.
     
  2. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,335
    25,742
    Jan 3, 2007
    I agree with this and have always said the same myself. Had Morrison given a similar life and death performance against a true world class opponent, THEN it would have elevated him to the upper echelon of the division. But as tough as Hipp was, he was no more than fringe at best.
     
  3. N_ N___

    N_ N___ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,204
    93
    Oct 1, 2014

    Too bad this can't be frozen as a signature here.
     
  4. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,560
    Jul 28, 2004
    Sultan was too slick and awkwardly clever for Tommy. Iggy was the best of the Russians.
     
  5. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    Yeah, it seems Morrison would have been better than Lewis had he not been so bad.
     
  6. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,600
    24,350
    Jul 21, 2012
    Once again you highlight everything wrong with Morrison, ignoring everything good he achieved that was far greater than Iggy , who proved nothing. Ever. The guy is soft and a quitter who doesn't belong anywhere near a warrior like Morrison.
    Ross Pirrity. All the sadder. Purrity could not beat Morrison could he?
    How is itsupposition:huh Foreman beat greater southies than Iggy so only pure logic states your opinion is incorrect.
    Wlad could not take him out because he did not try. Not once in the entire 12 rounds did he make the slightest effort to engage. It was a pitiful display from Wlad , so how can that be indicative of Iggys durability?
    Was Briggs not a bloated, puffed up, gassed out, immobile, apple cart who could not throw more than two punches a minute?
    You know this but ignore it to suit your agenda.
    Lots of guys were durable and fought their heart out to put food on the table in the 90's.
    Once again , Iggy was never in a fight and was panicked and dropped by a slow big stiff idiot in Austin. The same Autsin who lost to Harold Scorineres who was one of Wilder's early KO victims. At a time when Wilder's record was regarded as an embarrassment to professional boxing.
    Morrison blasted Hipp out of there with a broken jaw and two broken hands.
    Why do you not apply this reasoning to Wlad who struggled mightily with Peter and had to bend the rule book incessantly to win.
    And could not beat Willaimson but had to use a little scratch on his brow as an excuse to to quit.
    That says a lot more about Wlads true class in the sport than Morrison's , yet you ride Wlads jock strap something rotten:tired:dead:roll:
     
  7. Phil_Ivey_76

    Phil_Ivey_76 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,823
    176
    Aug 26, 2013
  8. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    Go on..I'm listening?
     
  9. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,242
    47,263
    Feb 11, 2005
    If a 12 year old with a Wlad complex posts in a forest and no one is there to listen, is it still a post
     
  10. brb

    brb Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,134
    67
    Sep 14, 2010
    I wouldn't bet the house on SI, but I do think he would win a close, but comfortable UD.

    116-112 or 117-111
     
  11. brb

    brb Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,134
    67
    Sep 14, 2010
    That's funny.
     
  12. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,600
    24,350
    Jul 21, 2012
    I have no Wlad complex. Did I just wake up one morning and decide i'm not going to like Wlad for no reason?

    My judgement is based purely from unbiased observation . I'm one of the most objective posters in this fantasy Klitschko forum.
     
  13. brb

    brb Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,134
    67
    Sep 14, 2010
    Then why do you always pick against Wlad?
     
  14. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,600
    24,350
    Jul 21, 2012
    Im picking against Iggy here. The only reason Iggy wins is because Wlads opponents -who are generally recognized as the cause of this HW era being the worst talent pool in history- somehow manage to beat every champ , title holder , top contender , ATG, Hall of famer from previous greater era's.

    All Wlas has is resume. Picking holes in that goes against their agenda.
    This was established as soon as Mendoza stamped the thread with his usual fanatical Pro Klitschko jibberish.

    No logical un biased reasoning should have Iggy beating Morrison. His record is garbage.
     
  15. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,242
    47,263
    Feb 11, 2005
    No way Morrison lasts the distance. Iggy had excellent stamina and output. Tommy would not be able to hang. Sooner than later, Morrison would go all out and play his trump card and **** out. KO6.