The queen of spin why did it take Joe 10 yrs to unify when most guys were dominating for 10 yrs? Also why didn't the WBO enforce its Mandatories explain this Failey!
Its funny you say this, but I once got a very funny PM from someone who found a debate I was in to be a very convincing arguement and said something amusing like O Pretaurious could do worse than recruiting my services
please don't make it so easy. unbeaten means nothing, the guy you are referring to was unable to even hold onto his EBU title for one fight. that means he was unbeaten against BUMS. You LIE. Why? magee wasn't a future wba champ, he was awarded interim title but promptly lost it straight away I his first proper title shot that followed. Failey, you LIE. WHY? everyione gives lacy a hard time. YOU LIE. he was ****, he promptly won and lost his title instantly like myger did. Everything you typed has failed, failey. This is why they are all laughing at you whislt you keep rehashing "no one can reply to my post"
Tell me what greater wins did Toney have at LHW? which is where those fights happened Imperial1s answer - .....stutter.....stutter.....duck
because joe was waiting for the superior boxer to get injured (ottke or Kessler) and then jump out and challenge them in Cardiff. sometimes you have to wait 10 years for that one chance. though to be fair,ottke was much more the pro at that cheat game.
joe already had the wbo title when Collins had NO title so what did Collins have to do with it. YOU LIE failey. since post prime reid matched joe equally, then perhaps calzaghe is lucky that prime reid didn't fight him, or he would have lost. Lets be honest joe didn't want to lose, so he likely didn't want reid when reid was prime. joe only fought woodhall when he as retiring with a back injury. IN THE AMATEURS?? HAHAHA. What bearing does the amateurs that have on when joe attempted to unify? probably true, ottke was a pointless titlist at times. HA Calzaghe was saved by his Cardiff ref in that fight when Byron slipped the fight was stopped. no we don't know that. no one except YOU knows that. that's why we asking you why it took 10 years.
joe already had the wbo title when Collins had NO title so what did Collins have to do with it. YOU LIE failey.This is not even relevant vaguely to what imperial asked you. since post prime reid matched joe equally, then perhaps calzaghe is lucky that prime reid didn't fight him, or he would have lost. Lets be honest joe didn't want to lose, so he likely didn't want reid when reid was prime. joe only fought woodhall when he as retiring with a back injury. this has nothing to do with unifying the titles. IN THE AMATEURS?? HAHAHA. What bearing does the amateurs that have on when joe attempted to unify? Are you seriously claiming that a fight as a kid amateur stopped adult 30something joe calzaghe trying to unify for 10 years as wbo titlist? probably true, ottke was a pointless titlist at times. ottke was the german calzaghe, its been said, only more so. HA Calzaghe was saved by his Cardiff ref in that fight when Byron slipped the fight was stopped. no we don't know that. no one except YOU knows that. that's why we asking you why it took 10 years.# nothing in your post except perhaps ottke is vaguely relevant to imperials question.
I have to say that I dont bother reading Herols posts anymore after having to correct him for constantly getting facts wrong and then later finding that he hadnt seen fights or fighters he commented on. Im sure if i was to waste my time looking at any post he wrote, it would almost definately be incorrect, and I have wasted alot of time and energy on the fool. He is not relevant, and doesnt get my time, he is a known joke, like another poster who constantly ducks... Back to post #82 . Still you sometimes come out with an interesting point and I dont think you are completely clueless, so tend to still read your posts a bit