The Marquez vs Pacquiao nonsense

Lol I cringe every time I see this.

 

So I basically destroyed your big head argument. Thanks.

:hi:

Tell me. How would Pac have juiced w/ a 3 week cut off?

Week 3 = fight week (interviews, promotional obligations, staying limber, resting)

That leaves 2 weeks. 2 weeks to dope, reap the benefits, and cycle it out?

atsch

 

I cringe, too. The man can barely speak English and relies on a set number of standard issue phrases: e.g. "My job is to train hard and give a good fight". <----- he will repeat this same line, verbatim, 5X for his next fight!

Kenney asked him open ended questions in his usual sped up delivery.

atsch

If he had something to hide, he would have barred Kenney from asking such questions or refuse an interview. Celebrities do this ALL the time where they grant interviews as long as certain topics are not discussed.

atsch

 

Waiting for an explanation for the acne and boils.

Roidquez is the Face of Doping.

:hi:

 

Destroyed the big head argument? No you stated your opinion. His head seemed to get dramatically bigger once he stepped up in weight.

Again, you defend his " I can't test in 14 days" because he would be "busy" lol do you know how dumb you sound? So he couldn't do it for Floyd but he did it for Bradley and Rios years later? Why's that??? (Please don't use the "testing is normal now")

Your such a fan boy, you won't even entertain the idea of Manny roiding despite him denying testing for Floyd , jmm 3/4.

There was a person on the board here who advised he was a med student and explained how its possible to roid. He basically destroyed pac****s like you. Feel free to dig up the thousands of pages in the PAC/Floyd express. Your just some pac**** with a agenda, I'll take a doctors word over yours.

Again, why couldn't Manny test?

Why did he deny testing for jmm vs PAC 3/4?

If he denied testing for " honor" why did he even bother with a cut off date?

Why did he test years later but not when he was destroying fighters in the ww?

Why did he all of a sudden loose his fire when Floyd asked for testing?

You say Manny would be to busy but yet him and his camp came up with excuses on how it would make him "weak" lol, did Manny tell you this personally? Seeing how you claim he would be busy and he says its not him being busy, but testing 14 days away would have a huge effect on him.

Again, I'm not nuthugger like you, the chance of jmm/PAC roiding are extremely high in my book.

 

There is definatly the certain set of supporters who use the term robbery, rather than neutral or fans of both.

The ones that use the term robbery (when Marquez lost)
- Marquez fans
- Mayweather fans/ Pacquiao haters.

I was saying on another thread, you notice how everyone who says Hopkins/ Calzaghe was a robbery (rather than a Joe win, draw or fight that could go either way) are the same posters who are fans of black Americans and Black Americans alone :think

 

That's not true. I give PAC the first 2 wins when some claimed robbery, I disagree because the fights were close. But the 3rd was a easy fight to score for jmm. I have scored the fight numerous times being generous to PAC and havent scored it for him. Of the first 3 fights, the 3rd was a fight where finally one fighter was able to stand out. Jmm just had way better ring general ship, picked his shots right and made PAC look desperate while missing wrecklessly.

I see your point though, there is a lot of fanboys so I won't argue that a lot of people simply come up with their favoring of fighters, just like PAC fans do as well also.

 

Yep but are you neutral in the Pac-Marquez argument or are you a fan of one more than the other?

I saw the third fight the rounds Marquez won he won by a mile- much more clear round for him.
The rounds Pac won not as clear.

But with the 10 point must system I think I could see it at the very most though as 7-5 to Pac if you give Pac every round except the rounds Marquez won by a mile. So I qualify that as 'one that could go either way, but should've gone to Marquez'

Whereas the Pac-Bradley 1 fight I saw 7 definite rounds for Pac so I saw that as a bit of a robbery, even though you technically could've had them the same score.

 

Yea I know which shot you are talking about I think it was round 5 after pac knocked down him down jmm landed the exact same shot he landed in round 6 but pac was not falling into the punch I also remember roy going ooooooh I was surprised pac never went down then he touched his gloves straight away trying to show it never hurt but it sure did hurt.

 

I'm a bigger Marquez fan as in I'll root for him against some one else. But when he looses I won't make up excuses or pretend I think he won. I feel Bradley dominated Marquez, though I get heat from Marquez fans here for saying it. I also feel Floyd outclassed jmm and even if Floyd did come in at weight, it wouldn't have made a difference.

The first fight I gave PAC the win
2nd PAC by SD
3rd fight I think I had jmm up by 3 rounds.

PAC is my 2nd favorite fighter, so I like him also. I also agree he was robbed against Bradley and shouldn't have lost his title. It hurts to see either PAC or jmm loose and if Floyd and PAC gets made, I'll be rooting for PAC (though I also like Floyd). We all have favorite fighters, but some just don't know how to watch a fight with out setting their agendas aside.

PAC is the overall better fighter, jmm in my opinion would of lost to some PAC beat. But jmm is PACs kryptonite and a atg in his own way. Both always bring the best out of each other.

 

So show us pictures of Acne and Boils all over those narcissistic muppets that cover themselves in oil and hold mister universe contests as it well known and accepted that they use steroids.

 

Close fights will always have their share of "robbery" complaints.

 

You fight with a guy 4 times, win only once, and claim you won them all. Some people have the sense of reality of a spoiled 4 year old brat.

 

Nearly all Marquez loses he's claimed he's won.

Putting your hands up in the air at the end of a fight like you've been robbed doesn't mean you have.

 

I skimmed that video and nothing fishy jumped out at me.

Was it where he is hitting the mitts?

I never found a part with him shirtless or anything.