Without PEDs, Roy Jones would've just been another Khan is my guess

Let's look at the similarities.

Roy Jones Jr & Amir Khan did terrific at the Olympics, both winning the Silver Medals.

Amir Khan lost in the final of the Olympics to some Cuban, while Roy Jones got schooled by some Korean bloke.

Both guys are amazingly talented individuals and both (in their primes) and both win rounds for fun.(the exceptions being Jones would lose every round to prime Calzaghe and Khan to Brook)

However both men are suspect because they have an Achilles heel: a repulsive egg shell mandible which was has been exposed in hilarious fashion.

There is a difference however:

Jones is a PED cheat and Khan is not.

Thus while Jones went on a run to P4P1 before his varnished by PEDs chin was shattered, Khan has had many a few backs.

The other difference is Khan is willing to fight the best having offered fights with Mayweather, Pacquiao, Bradley and Marquez at many points.

Jones meanwhile had PEDs shrink his testicles and in his prime he avoided young knock out artist Calzaghe, Julian Jackson, Gerarld McCllean, Nigel Been, Steve Collins, Chris Eubank, Frankie Liles, Dariuz Michaelczewski, Graciano Rocchigiani, Prime Bernard Hopkins, Lennox Lewis, Wladimir Klitschko, Corrie Sanders and Chris Byrd.


Had Jones not been on PEDs, or Khan was he and King Khan would have similar success.

 

when you troll as often as you do you will find much less people respond to your threads

 

Khan has heart.
Roy has an enlargened heart due to roids

 

Please explain to me this trolling lark the likes of you keep saying. How is this trolling. Roy Jones, in my opinion would have been as successful as Khan without PEDs.

Is trolling not saying an opinion you don't really have?

 

Yep. Roy also has shriveled up ***** too. :deal

 

put it this way. i did not even read ur initial post because i just write everything you say off as trolling, you dug your own hole. :-(

 

Well don't read the OP and answer my question.

This is to have a discussion about the similarties Khan and Jones have, but quizzing if the difference being the PEDs. How is it trolling? :think

 

This site is going to **** with these constant threads designed to just bait and troll. :-(

 

Once again, nobody can answer why this is trolling. Jones and Khan was both talented guys with a glass chin. Jones used PEDs, Khan didn't, is that why Jones had more success. Simple discussion.

So how's it trolling?

 

:rofl

 

To be fair Jones was a LOT better than Khan and didn't get ktfo by the soft opponents he faced until later on in his career. Khan has pretty much made a career out of being a KO risk against even the worst fighters.

Jones had a much better understanding of range than Khan. That was what enabled him to almost sort of have defensive skill, whereas Khan showed no defense worth speaking of until very recently.

PED use didn't help Jones with his range mastery, and they wouldn't do much for Khan aside from maybe make him hit harder.

 

Before you start typing do you ever think whether someone would actually be interested in reading the **** you come out with?

What's the point? You're wasting your life (if you have one) and you just come across as a sad, inadequate loser, which i'm guessing isn't the image you're trying to portray.

 

Mate, I felt the need to reply because, as endless others have told you, you're a boring sad individual. If attacking/defending and getting overly invested in certain boxers careers (who don't even care if you exist) is your idea of fun then so be it.

Coming on here sometimes is like walking into a room expecting an intelligent discussion and having some re**** (that's you) scream in your face constantly.

How about some quality rather than quantity? Or better than that nothing at all.

 

.....and what's with the keyboard warrior insults?! Isn't that pretty much much the definition of some inadequate with over 10'000 posts on an internet forum slagging off boxers who've probably acheived more in one lifetime than you could manage in a million.