Joe Calzaghe retired 46-0 (32) in 2008. Get over it. Fans & haters; quit trolling!

Veit had claim to Calzaghes world title and had beaten world class opponents and has a better resume than many in the top 10 today

 

It seems the greatest SMW of all time has got under the skin of the haters

 

did someone mention king of 4-6 rounders super Veit as if to big up joe calzaghe?

whys that, then?

 

Not only do I believe this to be a troll post, but it isn't even accurate.. You have made several mistakes... You get an A for effort though.:good

 

That's right the king of the 4 rounders was ever so dangerous :rofl

 

Where are these mistakes you speak of?

 

No Herol. He's not

Hopkins' loss to Joe came between his two biggest victories (Tarver and Pavlik) where he scored near shut-outs against two champions.

Only if you're re****ed, Herol.

Beating Tarver (and Winkie) decisively immediately before Joe, and Pavlik immediately after, does not constitute a 'losing streak' unless, as I mentioned already, you happen to be re****ed.

Try again.:yep

 

try again why? mention again what I already wrote, three losses and DQ?

or have you chosen not to read them, making them "untrue" in a denial sense for you?

 

be fair, its 4-6 rounders. king of 4-6 rounders. who fought for joes world title twice.

in fact lets not sell him short, more than 2/3rds of his resume consists of 4-8 rounders.

basically his resume consistutes in rounds about a third less of what the average above-national fighter does.

yet I am sure someone mentioned this joke of a subnational as evidence that calzaghes resume is strong..... who might that be? there cant be many who would claim that.

 

Retar ded and blind.

Let's look at Bernard's complete record from 2006 till 2008.

Bernard defeated Tarver
Bernard defeated Wright
Bernard lost to Joe.
Bernard defeated Pavlik.



So, his loss to Joe came right in the middle of his best ever winning streak.


Maybe another try ?

 

Its full of garbage and you know it..

DM wasn't stripped of the IBF, he vacated.

You also don't credit Roy for any defenses, which isn't true. It is a fairy tale. It is not Roy's fault DM vacated and was stripped, but he did fight for and defend those titles.

I also like how you like Rico, credit Calzaghe for being #1 in 2 divisions, even though he became LHW champ for beating the man that beat Roy.. You can't have it both ways.

It is also funny how you credit Calzaghe with a Ring defense at LHW.. If you are going to stick to your idiotic anti Roy logic, he should have 0 defenses of that title because it should have been Erdei's belt and Joe would have never been a 2 weight champ at all.

Like I said, I believe you to be trolling, but you put effort into it and I applaud you.:good

 

I count 4 losses, 3 wins, 1 DQ. the wins are NOT Hopkins best wins at all, though they were very good for his age. Tarver was however way past it, Wright was a MW getting on too,and Pavlik has proved nothing on the world scene since that loss.

the question remains why you aren't counting them. no need to be defensive with insults.

 

Ok my bad

 

Its you mentioning Veit as proof of Calzaghes greatness??

You are failey in disguise!