The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Thank you haha

 

Marry me abuffy!

 

I did. It was interesting. Pacquiao will actually study the style of his opponent before a fight and will prepare THEIR style, not his. This may have contributed to his versatility.

I wonder if he does this because he feels he could then fight at their game if something happened where he couldn't win with his.

 

All my tweets are either about Pacquiao, Mayweather, boxing in general, or Grizzlies basketball. I figured that would be proof enough.

 

You mean Brook's son? The one who talked and talked about how easy it was going to beat Brooks?

 

Are you saying he loses all credibility when talking about boxing because he has lost when he said he would win? Why would this discredit him when speaking about other boxer's?

 

but porter also said he would beat both so....

I think Manny has fought differently in his last two fights, smarter.

this is a good ****ysis of tactics in the bradley vs pac fight, comparing to tactics pac used in previous fights. This person did an excellent job breaking this down.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGTMg5vZ3ho

 

Funny, i cant think of any excuses that floyd fanboys will have when he loses. There wont be any excuses, better start coming up with them fast, im sure floyds already got a few lined up.

 

yo seriously, who gives a flying **** if abuffy is a woman or not. Y'all acting like a bunch of virgins salivating at the thought of a lady posting in these forums.
abuffy seems to be a knowledgeable poster that's not trolling others. She could be Kim Jong Un for all I care lol

 

go back to lurking, brah

edit: errrr come back FROM lurking, brah

 

i don't need proof, i don't care if you are a hot girl or not, what difference does it make for me when i'm here to talk boxing not pick up girls. The other guys seemed to care and demanded proof, not sure why.

 

Porter did say he'd beat both(then again, it is rare for a boxer to admit he'd lose against someone lol), but that doesn't mean he is wrong when he says Pacquiao is versatile.

I don't know if he is more versatile than Floyd Mayweather, but Pacquiao is definitely versatile. He does fight smarter too. I agree.

I think Bradley pretty much sums it up.

 

Thank you :happy

 

I totally agree with you. I want to focus on breakdowns, ****yses, etc as much as you do. I just felt insulted when people thought I was a creepy, old catfish, old man, or something that was here to just troll and fool you guys. You didn't though, so we're good.