A question to Roy Jones Jnr fans about his win over J Toney

Im not trolling and when I say exposed, it is probably being taken in a different context.
I was asking if Toney didnt have his 0, would he have been as highly a rated win. I cant see what is so difficult to understand with that?
when I said exposed, it was meant how some fighters are shown to have a style weakness in certain areas, which is often something that top fighters can use to win fights.
M Schmeling noted that after jabbing J Lewis would drop his guard, which is where he was able to land punches over the top. He exposed a weakness. That doesnt mean Lewis wasnt a great fighter, but Max had seen something he could use, and the point is that when some fighters have had so many close fights, they are close fights because the opponent has had success, which is success another fighter can watch and take into the ring against the opponent.
I mentioned another example with Froch, who is a fighter that I like alot.

Here is a repeated post below

No my point was if Toney had of lost by SD to Johnson, lost by SD to Sosa, lost by SD to Tiberi etc, would the Jones win have been considered as big? I would guess not as people are looking at his boxrec.
Nobody is questioning who he fought. Here is a post to another poster who needed further explaining -
Toney although having good performances also had some performances where style problems were revealed. Another example is with Froch like how many predicted for Ward to beat Froch, based on a tough fight with Adamu, Pascal, Taylor a SD that some feel he lost to Dirrell, a loss to Kessler a Mdec to old boiled down SMW journeyman Johnson. Before that fight, what Froch is good and not good at, had been found out, which is what I think about the Toney/Jones fight.
Toney had been in a tough fight with C Williams in the very fight before he fought Jones, had been troubled by pressure from Tiberi etc. With Jones, he hadnt really had many problems from opponents that Toney could site, but Toney had, had several. If the M Griffin fight for Jones, had of happened, it may have given him something he could have looked at for example

 

Often many dont know the full facts and those posts often give posters who take the time to read them, a little bit of info that they were not aware of, before posting incorrect posts.
I think you are jumping to a conclusion, and making assumptions, but I dont care enough to be bothered with what you think, if im honest. No offence

 

Lets just stick with the fighters related to the post today. thanks

 

I only tend to dispute alot of what is factually incorrect.
With toney it wasnt one off night I was pointing to and I was saying he wasnt good, but was pointing that he could have had a loss and if he did, would the Jones fight have been viewed the same, which seems to make fans struggle to answer.
I think the win is looked back on favouraby due to an undefeated record, which I do think often mentally assists a fighter