A question to Roy Jones Jnr fans about his win over J Toney

You still haven't worked out what precursor means in chemistry have you, imbecile. So here it is again.

In chemistry, a precursor is a compound that participates in the chemical reaction that produces another compound. In biochemistry, the term "precursor" is used more specifically to refer to a chemical compound preceding another in a metabolic pathway.

Get someone from Arkansas to explain it to you, as they will be far cleverer than you are.

And while you are at it tell your new friend how you think Roids body was put through hell compared to Glen Johnson's. What was it again? Oh yeah, " his big bad daddy used to hit him with a stick"

What is your excuse, your old man drop you on your head?

 

Yeah yeah toney sucked, roy jones sucked, americans are low class trash. Im assuming youre british? Lol, the revolutionary war still stings don't it? or the fact that even though the british invented the sport America has a greater legacy of champions yeah that probably hurts. Honestly these discussions are dumb and unproductive. Its as bad as the Lewis/Klitschko arguments or May/Pac. Are there holes in Toney's legacy? Sure. Are there some in Roy's? Certainly. The fact remains both guys were incredibly talented boxers who reached the peak of the sport in multiple weight classes, and left us with amazing careers we can appreciate and enjoy. Just enjoy the fights and quit being a hater. The nationalism stuff is insane, I'm American but my favorite heavyweight was Lewis, and why? Because I liked the way he fought, and enjoyed, and still enjoy watching his fights. Not everything is Us vs Them. Also btw I love how you try and automatically call it a loss 8 months later in McCallum 2. If youre gonna do that then you must call the first fight as a win for Toney right? Be consistent. You cant just pick and choose the fights you want to back up your argument you have to look at the whole picture.

 

I see you conveniently ignored my post above..

So I will show you again and even add a bit... Read below.

I didn't quote you, I quoted a great post that tore you a new one.

I don't ride anyone's coat tails... But I find It hilarious when you get destroyed... And it makes it even better that you don't even realize it because you have the brain the size of a pea.:rofl

Stop lying about what I said... I have never said Roy didn't take PEDS. Not only are you an idiot but a compulsive liar.

It was you that so proudly claimed Roy took Andro

It is a huge suspicion that Roy's lawyers came up with that story as damage control, as it was available over the counter and you needed no roid dealer... I am surprised you believe it.:rofl

I simply said, If Roy was taking Roids, it would have been many other better roids on the market then, not one that is not proven to increase strength and speed, and can just as likely make you grow man tits.

Androstenedione

Much of what has been said about androstenedione has been distorted by the press looking for a story, the vitamin industry looking for a profit, and even scientific types looking for a little limelight. Will andro turn you into a massive-biceped, home-run-hitting hero? Not a chance -- yet that doesn't mean it's useless. New evidence suggests that andro's real strengths lie not on the field, but in the bedroom.
Like testosterone, androstenedione is classified as an androgen, a class of steroids that occur naturally in your body. These are the hormones responsible for a deep voice, strong *** drive, body hair, muscular build, etc. Produced in the testes and the adrenal glands, andro is primarily converted into the more biologically potent testosterone. That's why andro is called a "precursor."
Athletes have used male hormones for years to increase their mass, strength and performance. Testosterone and its chemical derivatives -- anabolic steroids -- build muscle, though at the risk of a host of side effects, including heart and liver problems. Since testosterone is currently banned by several athletic organizations as a performance-enhancing drug, people began taking andro hoping that it would convert to testosterone. However, this process is complex and can differ substantially from one guy to the next. For example, andro can also convert to estrogen, which can lead to male breast development.
If your body does convert andro into testosterone, it may be further metabolized into a substance called dihydrotestosterone. The conversion of testosterone to DHT is responsible for increases in facial and body hair, abnormal growth of the prostate and male hair loss. If you're concerned about losing your hair, you don't want extra hormones circulating in your body, especially since an increase in testosterone doesn't guarantee an anabolic response in your muscles.

 

Who do you like in this mythical matchup. 1990 Steve Collins versus 1990 Roy Jones jr?

 

You got one thing right. You're Murican, one can tell by the waffle. The first Toney / McCallum fight was a draw, the second one was a loss for Mike 9 months later. The third when Mike finally called it a day was almost 5 years after that and he lost that one too

So wtf are you on about.

Oh, I see your just another one who is trying the round robin bullsh*t. Toney beating a past his best 35 year old Mike was brilliant, so by extension Jones beating Toney a couple of years later is even greater than that. GTFO with that garbage.

You are better off posting with Mind Fvcked, and Gimperial. They are proper Jones nut huggers.

 

I told you that the true boxing fan would humiliate, embarrass and prevail over the untrue fan. Boxing is too serious a sport to fool fans by trying to pull wool over their head lol.

 

lol:

 

Foxy and Bailey are two UK **** riders who love Calzaghe. Their stench was smelled long before this post was ever written. When Bailey said that Toney was losing to Nunn" I almost ****ed myself. We know that's the truth but you turned it into a knock lol. Pathetic lol. Hearns was beating Leonard, Tate over Weaver, Froch overTaylor lol...wait. That's how im going to judge Froch lol. Baileys method of reasoning. Thanks Bailey and um Foxy lol.

 

Imma say in Frochs win over JT that JT had Froch on ***** Street and ready to go lol... Then imma say that Glen Johnson was 2000 years old and that Kessler and Ward embarrassed Froch. Watch how I do this lol.

 

Lol. Im not even a Jones fan, so nice try there, but ill apologize for at first glance assuming you meant toney lost the second fight. But seriously who's legacy are your trying to debate now? Mike's? Roy's? Toney's? All great fighters so what the hell? I never said beating a 35 year old McCallum was brilliant, you put words in my mouth. You also fail to realize that at the time, it was certainly perceived that way, considering the fact that McCallum was a heavy favorite. But whatever put your earmuffs on and keep losing an already fvcking stupid debate.

 

:rofl

 

34 year old mike beat the RJJ would-be killer Steve Collins so he must have been pretty good still. 34 year old Mccallum also beat up the Nigel Benn-killer Michael Watson.

Mccallum was something of a Brit-crusher it seems. All at the advanced age of 34.

 

Damn, Dobby smartened up while I was gone lol.

 

:deal

 

Toney looked closed to death in the ring and at the weigh ins.