A question to Roy Jones Jnr fans about his win over J Toney

I hope I haven't self pawned.

 

No, still would have been good win though as nobody still would have beat him like Roy did...

Handing someone their first loss adds to it IMO, especially when they faced the elite opposition Toney had.

 

What part of I don't fvcking care what Roid Jones fans or any other Muricans perceive are you having trouble understanding? They are nonentities as far as I'm concerned. A guy who gets a decision that is so iffy even a senator demands a stewards enquiry, which reveals that 2 judges were not even licensed in New Jersey, and s****es a draw with an old past it McCallum, then a win at a second attempt, is NOT the number 2 fighter in the world by any other standard than Jones fans, and desperate Muricans, to be seen as top dogs.

 

Haven't you got any washing to do Lizzy?

 

Still wouldn't have compared with Johnson's win over Roid though would it? Beat him up for 9 rounds then put the fvckwit to sleep.:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

Stop wriggling and squirming, you pathetic cretin. You've been shown up with your garbage about favourites getting points for just being favourite. I shot your garbage down by showing that the favourite was robbed in Lewis Holyfield 1. Then again you being a dumb Murican probably think cheating is normal.

Now off you go to sniff pants with the other weirdo's GIMP and Miss Lizzy.:hi:

I also notice you have carefully ducked the article in which Toney FINALLY admitted he LOST to Tibeiri.

Quack quack.

 

Toney was considered one of the very best fighters on the planet back then.

Yes, he struggled with Tiberi, but it happens. Look at his schedule back then.

Mike McCallum might have been past his absolute peak, but he was still an elite fighter in 1991. He certainly wasn't past it. When a fighter is past it, he's clearly either well past his best, or shot. Look who Mike had beaten not long before the Toney fight. He'd beaten Herol Graham, Steve Collins, Michael Watson, and Sumbu Kalambay etc.


:good

 

First off read this.


[url]http://boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:5864[/url]

Then come back and give me all the bullsh*t excuses. Toney being classed as the #2 fighter in the world based on corruption and Murican xenophobia might impress some gullible folks, but it doesn't impress everyone, as much as they might hope it does.

Secondly, Mike was well past his best. Look at his career after that draw. The only thing of note was beating Harding, he LOST to anyone better than that, and it was down to age.

Again some fools might be stupid enough to fall for this every fighter ages differently garbage, but I'm not. so spare me that sh*t.

No elite fighter is as good at 35 as he was at 30. Like I said to that Chris, you show me 10 that were, and I'll show 50 that were not.

 

With all due respect, Mccallum beat legendary British fighters Michael Watson and Steve Collins when he was 33. Then he beat Sumbu Kalambay at 34.

Are you saying he then underwent a sudden and catastrophic decline before fighting Toney at age 35?

Foxy, you're coming a little unhinged in this thread.

And all the "Murican" stuff makes you seem rather petty and pathetic. Loudon is a gentleman, you don't see him calling people names.

Are you some sort of a soccer hooligan? I can imagine you, teeth-bared, trampling over the fans of the rival club at Chelsea or Manchester or something. Good lord, Foxy, put yourself together.